comp.databases.theory

• Date Index

---

• Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Hans Mayr
  • Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Cimode
  • Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Bob Badour
    • Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Philipp Post
      • Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Bob Badour
      • Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions, Hans Mayr
• Is a function a relation?, David BL
  • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
  • Re: Is a function a relation?, Keith H Duggar
    • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Cimode
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, David BL
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
      • Re: Is a function a relation?, none
    • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
  • Re: Is a function a relation?, Marshall
• AT&T Usenet Netnews Service Shutting Down, newsmaster
• Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Christoph Rupp
  • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Roy Hann
    • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Christoph Rupp
    • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Christoph Rupp
    • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, Roy Hann
      • Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation, --CELKO--
• Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Cimode
  • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Brian Selzer
    • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Cimode
      • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Brian Selzer
  • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Walter Mitty
    • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Brian Selzer
    • Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?, Cimode
• Working with idiots can kill you!, Walter Mitty
• Jan, please reply, Bob Badour
• Is this query optimized?, lawpoop
  • Re: Is this query optimized?, lawpoop
    • Re: Is this query optimized?, Bob Badour
    • Re: Is this query optimized?, toby
      • Re: Is this query optimized?, Bob Badour
  • Re: Is this query optimized?, --CELKO--
• On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
  • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
  • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Tegiri Nenashi
    • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Walter Mitty
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Walter Mitty
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Walter Mitty
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Brian Selzer
      • Re: On specialization constraints time of application, Cimode
• Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
  • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
    • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, DBMS_Plumber
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, jaygarrick7
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, jaygarrick7
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, jaygarrick7
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, jaygarrick7
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, toby
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, David BL
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, rpost
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Roy Hann
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Roy Hann
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Brian Selzer
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Nilone
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Marshall
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, rpost
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, none
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, toby
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, paul c
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, dr . coffee1
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, toby
  • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, cimode
  • Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?, Bernard Peek
• DEFAULT constraint?, Karsten Wutzke
  • Re: DEFAULT constraint?, Philipp Post
• laugh of the day, paul c
  • Re: laugh of the day, cimode
    • Re: laugh of the day, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: laugh of the day, cimode
    • Re: laugh of the day, Roy Hann
      • Re: laugh of the day, Walter Mitty
• More on identifiers, David BL
  • Re: More on identifiers, Walter Mitty
    • Re: More on identifiers, Roy Hann
      • Re: More on identifiers, paul c
      • Re: More on identifiers, Bob Badour
    • Re: More on identifiers, robur . 6
      • Re: More on identifiers, Roy Hann
      • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
      • Re: More on identifiers, Walter Mitty
      • Re: More on identifiers, paul c
      • Re: More on identifiers, Bob Badour
      • Re: More on identifiers, Brian Selzer
      • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
      • Re: More on identifiers, jefftyzzer
    • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
    • Re: More on identifiers, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: More on identifiers, Walter Mitty
    • Re: More on identifiers, JOG
      • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
      • Re: More on identifiers, none
      • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
    • Re: More on identifiers, Bernard Peek
      • Re: More on identifiers, vadimtro
  • Re: More on identifiers, --CELKO--
  • Re: More on identifiers, Joe Thurbon
    • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
      • Re: More on identifiers, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
      • Re: More on identifiers, Joe Thurbon
  • Re: More on identifiers, Walter Mitty
    • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
  • Re: More on identifiers, JOG
    • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
  • Re: More on identifiers, Marshall
    • Re: More on identifiers, Bob Badour
      • Re: More on identifiers, Marshall
    • Re: More on identifiers, David BL
• Relation subset operators, Cimode
  • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
  • Re: Relation subset operators, --CELKO--
    • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Bob Badour
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, vadimtro
      • Re: Relation subset operators --> negation, vadimtro
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Marshall
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, vadimtro
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
  • Re: Relation subset operators, paul c
    • Re: Relation subset operators, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
      • Re: Relation subset operators, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
    • Re: Relation subset operators, cimode
• How to make a binary tree in JSP?, amit.chhodhary@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to make a binary tree in JSP?, Sabine Dinis Blochberger
• Logic and databases, paul c
  • Re: Logic and databases, Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Row-level security?, lawpoop
  • Re: Row-level security?, Bob Badour
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Row-level security?, lawpoop
    • Re: Row-level security?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Row-level security?, lawpoop
      • Re: Row-level security?, Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
  • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, toby
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, David BL
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, cimode
      • Re: ID field as logical address, cimode
      • Re: ID field as logical address, David BL
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
      • Re: ID field as logical address, David BL
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Kevin Kirkpatrick
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, robur . 6
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, robur . 6
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bob Badour
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, robur . 6
      • Re: ID field as logical address, robur . 6
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, JOG
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, JOG
      • Re: ID field as logical address, robur . 6
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, JOG
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, JOG
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, none
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, JOG
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
      • Re: ID field as logical address, none
      • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
  • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Bernard Peek
      • Re: ID field as logical address, rpost
  • Re: ID field as logical address, Brian Selzer
  • Re: ID field as logical address, David BL
    • Re: ID field as logical address, Walter Mitty
      • Re: ID field as logical address, David BL
  • Re: ID field as logical address, vadimtro
    • Re: ID field as logical address, paul c
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
  • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, paul c
    • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, paul c
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, paul c
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, paul c
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, paul c
      • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, David BL
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys, Bob Badour
• A silly analogy, Roy Hann
  • Re: A silly analogy, Walter Mitty
    • Re: A silly analogy, Roy Hann
      • Re: A silly analogy, Walter Mitty
      • Re: A silly analogy, Roy Hann

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2009-06