Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:05:19 -0800
Bob Badour wrote:
....
Are you familiar with Fabian's observations regarding 'denormalization for performance' ? He observes that such 'denormalized' schemas are slower if one actually declares the constraints; thereby suggesting any performance difference comes at the cost of integrity.
...
I think I agree with him and I'd even go further and say that the only kind of denormalization there is, is 'logical denormalization', in a nutshell,logical re-casting of logical expressions. I think when most people talk of 'denormalization' what they are really talking about are physical re-arrangements but always in the back of their minds is a rigid, simplistic misconception, which they imagine is some kind of governing principle, that the physical image is a direct image. There is no such thing as 'physical denormalization' in the first place.
.
- References:
- A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- From: Bob Badour
- A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- Prev by Date: Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints
- Next by Date: Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints
- Previous by thread: Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- Next by thread: Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4
- Index(es):