Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:03:28 -0800
Bob Badour wrote:
paul c wrote:
Bob Badour wrote:
...
Dijkstra wrote an EWD where he explained why programming in a second language has advantages.
Did Cobol have a French dialect when he wrote that?
Are you aware of Dijkstra's position on Cobol?
Thanks, no, I'll take a look. My question sounded good to me when I wrote it, I'm not so sure now!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- References:
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: vadimtro
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Cimode
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: paul c
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- From: Bob Badour
- A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- Prev by Date: Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- Next by Date: Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- Previous by thread: Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- Next by thread: Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|