comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: patrick61z
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: patrick61z
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: patrick61z
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: patrick61z
• Re: Object oriented database
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object oriented database
  • From: patrick61z
• Re: Object oriented database
  • From: Eric
• Re: Object oriented database
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: JOG
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Roy Hann
• Object oriented database
  • From: mrtomas
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: paul c
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Srubys
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: paul c
• Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: JOG
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: JOG
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: JOG
• Re: Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: robert stearns
• Need to activate a database?
  • From: Troels Arvin
• Must we also create separate tables?
  • From: Srubys
• We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but...
  • From: Srubys
• Re: design question
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: xyzzy
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: toby
• Re: design question
  • From: TroyK
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: David BL
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Automatic Normalisation
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: JOG
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: xyzzy
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: Automatic Normalisation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Srubys
• Automatic Normalisation
  • From: xyzzy
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: paul c
• Re: Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Article claims the following table is not in 1NF
  • From: Srubys
• Few confusing things about first normal form
  • From: Srubys
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: JOG
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: JOG
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: tlbaxter99
• Re: Modeling question...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: David BL
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: tlbaxter99
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: paul c
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: Walter Mitty
• ?? Functional Dependency Question ??
  • From: tlbaxter99
• Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce
  • From: Daniel Pitts
• RDBMS vs Map/Reduce
  • From: Daniel Pitts
• Re: design question
  • From: JOG
• Re: Replication in databases
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: Modeling Order Extensions
  • From: soren . bendixen
• Re: Replication in databases
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: Modeling Order Extensions
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Modeling Order Extensions
  • From: Lars Tackmann
• Re: design question
  • From: JOG
• Re: design question
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: design question
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: A good database monitoring program?
  • From: Emre
• Re: Replication in databases
  • From: David BL
• Re: Replication in databases
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: design question
  • From: JOG
• Re: A good database monitoring program?
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: design question
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Proper multi-users design
  • From: David BL
• Re: design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Proper multi-users design
  • From: Ael
• Re: design question
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: design question
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Proper multi-users design
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Proper multi-users design
  • From: Ael
• design question
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: David BL
• Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity
  • From: Bob Badour
• A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: eric . bouchardlefebvre
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• A good database monitoring program?
  • From: Emre
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: Mark S. (UK)
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Tony Toews [MVP]
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Daniel Pitts
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: eric . bouchardlefebvre
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Tony Toews [MVP]
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Why is database integrity so impopular ?
  • From: eric . bouchardlefebvre
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: xyzzy
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: xyzzy
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: David BL
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: paul c
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: JOG
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: paul c
• Re: Simple database design question
  • From: Bob Badour

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2008-10