comp.databases.theory

• Date Index

---

• Object oriented database, mrtomas
  • Re: Object oriented database, Bob Badour
  • Re: Object oriented database, Eric
  • Re: Object oriented database, patrick61z
    • Re: Object oriented database, Bob Badour
• Need to activate a database?, Troels Arvin
• Must we also create separate tables?, Srubys
  • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, robert stearns
  • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Walter Mitty
  • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, paul c
    • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, paul c
      • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Srubys
      • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Hugo Kornelis
      • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Srubys
  • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, Hugo Kornelis
  • Re: Must we also create separate tables?, patrick61z
• We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Srubys
  • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Walter Mitty
  • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Hugo Kornelis
    • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Srubys
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Bob Badour
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Hugo Kornelis
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., paul c
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Hugo Kornelis
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., paul c
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Roy Hann
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Walter Mitty
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., JOG
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Srubys
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Jon Heggland
      • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Hugo Kornelis
  • Re: We claim that delete anomality is due to table not being in 3NF, but..., Jon Heggland
• Automatic Normalisation, xyzzy
  • Re: Automatic Normalisation, Bob Badour
  • Re: Automatic Normalisation, Walter Mitty
• Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, Srubys
  • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, xyzzy
    • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, paul c
    • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, xyzzy
  • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, Walter Mitty
    • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, Srubys
      • Re: Article claims the following table is not in 1NF, Srubys
• Few confusing things about first normal form, Srubys
  • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, David Portas
    • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Srubys
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, David Portas
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Srubys
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, paul c
    • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, David BL
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, paul c
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, David BL
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, JOG
    • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Roy Hann
  • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, JOG
  • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Walter Mitty
    • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, paul c
      • Re: Few confusing things about first normal form, Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Modeling question..., Volker Hetzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
    • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
    • Re: Modeling question..., Walter Mitty
      • Re: Modeling question..., Roy Hann
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., Walter Mitty
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., Roy Hann
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., Roy Hann
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., toby
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., Walter Mitty
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., Bob Badour
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., JOG
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
      • Re: Modeling question..., David BL
      • Re: Modeling question..., Walter Mitty
    • Re: Modeling question..., paul c
• ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, tlbaxter99
  • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Walter Mitty
  • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Bob Badour
    • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
    • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
    • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Bob Badour
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, JOG
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, JOG
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, JOG
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Bob Badour
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Bob Badour
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, David BL
    • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, Tegiri Nenashi
  • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
  • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, tlbaxter99
    • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, paul c
  • Re: ?? Functional Dependency Question ??, tlbaxter99
• RDBMS vs Map/Reduce, Daniel Pitts
  • Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce, Daniel Pitts
• Modeling Order Extensions, Lars Tackmann
  • Re: Modeling Order Extensions, Bob Badour
  • Re: Modeling Order Extensions, soren . bendixen
• Re: Replication in databases, Christoph Rupp
  • Re: Replication in databases, David BL
    • Re: Replication in databases, Christoph Rupp
    • Re: Replication in databases, Christoph Rupp
• Proper multi-users design, Ael
  • Re: Proper multi-users design, Walter Mitty
    • Re: Proper multi-users design, Ael
  • Re: Proper multi-users design, David BL
• design question, robur . 6
  • Re: design question, -CELKO-
  • Re: design question, Ed Prochak
    • Re: design question, robur . 6
      • Re: design question, Ed Prochak
      • Re: design question, JOG
      • Re: design question, robur . 6
      • Re: design question, Jon Heggland
      • Re: design question, JOG
      • Re: design question, robur . 6
      • Re: design question, JOG
  • Re: design question, Jon Heggland
  • Re: design question, TroyK
    • Re: design question, robur . 6
      • Re: design question, Walter Mitty
      • Re: design question, robur . 6
• A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity, Roy Hann
  • Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity, Bob Badour
  • Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity, DBMS_Plumber
    • Re: A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity, Roy Hann
• A good database monitoring program?, Emre
  • Re: A good database monitoring program?, Ed Prochak
    • Re: A good database monitoring program?, Emre
• Why is database integrity so impopular ?, eric . bouchardlefebvre
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Alfredo Novoa
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, eric . bouchardlefebvre
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, patrick61z
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, paul c
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Tony Toews [MVP]
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Tony Toews [MVP]
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Daniel Pitts
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, David BL
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, patrick61z
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, paul c
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Walter Mitty
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Roy Hann
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, eric . bouchardlefebvre
  • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, DBMS_Plumber
    • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, DBMS_Plumber
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, paul c
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, David BL
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, David BL
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, DBMS_Plumber
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, David BL
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Walter Mitty
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, David BL
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Roy Hann
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Ed Prochak
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Why is database integrity so impopular ?, paul c
• Re: Simple database design question, Bob Badour
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Simple database design question, paul c
  • Re: Simple database design question, JOG
    • Re: Simple database design question, paul c
    • Re: Simple database design question, David BL
    • Re: Simple database design question, Bob Badour
  • Re: Simple database design question, -CELKO-
    • Re: Simple database design question, xyzzy
      • Re: Simple database design question, xyzzy
      • Re: Simple database design question, Mark S. (UK)
      • Re: Simple database design question, patrick61z

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2008-10