Re: Guessing?
- From: David BL <davidbl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
On May 28, 11:10 am, paul c <toledoby...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
David BL wrote:
On May 28, 10:28 am, paul c <toledoby...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
...A DBMS implementation is not concerned with questions of existence.
Hmmm, Principle of Non-Existence?
I'm only suggesting that a DBMS implementation should respect the
possibility that intensional definitions are present.
Isn't it constraints that make intensions concrete?
An intensional definition of a base relvar may allow a user to fully
verify its extension recorded in the DB. This is a form of integrity
not normally captured by formal integrity constraints enforced by the
DBMS.
.
- References:
- Guessing?
- From: paul c
- Re: Guessing?
- From: David BL
- Re: Guessing?
- From: paul c
- Re: Guessing?
- From: David BL
- Re: Guessing?
- From: paul c
- Re: Guessing?
- From: David BL
- Re: Guessing?
- From: paul c
- Guessing?
- Prev by Date: Re: Guessing?
- Next by Date: Re: Guessing?
- Previous by thread: Re: Guessing?
- Next by thread: Re: Guessing?
- Index(es):