Re: Flash to JOG
- From: Cimode <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 13, 12:36 pm, JOG <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriolI am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No
has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that
the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a
necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer
distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else
our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no
programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the
concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence.
indexes, no other access than disk)
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
.
- References:
- Flash to JOG
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Flash to JOG
- From: JOG
- Flash to JOG
- Prev by Date: Re: Object-relational impedence
- Next by Date: Re: About grammar and syntax on a possible relational language
- Previous by thread: Re: Flash to JOG
- Index(es):