Re: The Terrific Trio
- From: Cimode <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 05:15:29 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 3, 3:10 am, paul c <toledoby...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[Snipped]
Cimode, please don't say that. AFAIAC you are a "wise" guy in the bestThats is very considerate of you to say that but I assure you, not
several senses of the word (even if I doubt that any engine of yours
would please me, for that matter no engine of my own has ever pleased
me!).
deserved. Unfortunately, I wish I had such a good opinion of myself.
The problem when trying to clarify a computing model that would
deliver what a TRDBMS is supposed to deliver, is that one quickly runs
into mathematical questions that require a mathematical responses that
are both coherent with relational algebra but not only. On the last
few years, I have determined some solutions calling for help a broader
range of mathematical tools, but an entire realm of questions I have
not answered and doubt I will some day. Which is why I revised my
ambition and decided to build a core that would allow reasonable
people to ask the right questions instead of me and maybe answer them
at a later time. I have ran into some problems that Steve Tarin
probably ran into while designing the TRM and tried to avoid the traps
he probably fell into. So far I have determined the precise
fundamental reason why TRM was doomed to failure: it explores the
concept of data independence logical representation but does not
characterize the traps in which it is important not to fall.
I have some satisfaction because I have the mathematical probabilistic
proof that any direct image implementation fundamentally necessarily
consumes more resources a non direct image system but not for the
reasons we usually imagine. Subsequently to this formal
demonstration, I have worked at designing a logical representation of
data layer that includes the discoveries and brings innovative
perspective onto relation operation and manipulation . But the more I
dig into unknown waters, the more I realize how limited is the time to
solve these issues. I sometime feel lonely into this effort and wish
I could have a helping hand. So I delude myself into the hope of
finding men of reasonnable and good faith on Usenet to verify my proof
and eventually point out and correct my mistakes.
Usenet is full of linear thinkers (like me) and there are way tooQuite frankly, I am highly skeptical about the *multidimensional*
many of those for one planet.
fancy aspect of science. As far as I am concerned, cautious and
linear progress of science is a guarantee of soundness. In such
tedious process, one *may* run into interesting discoveries but that
is the exception not the rule.
Maybe you were just born stupid and yourI will keep that in mind. Thanks.
native tongue makes you seem smart to me, but that doesn't matter in the
end, plus I don't think you are stupid at all, unlike so many of the
copycats, illiterates and fake rationalists that are showing up here
lately. Nor are you aren't a phoney. To my more-or-less English ears,
your lingo comes across as quite earnest and therefore respectable, even
if it sounds disjointed at times. Nothing against phonies who don't
know it except that there is really no such thing - if there were, they
would be easily dispensed with since they would be mere unknowing
pretenders who succumbed to cross-posting until a more civilized culture
had been explained to them. You have no need to apologize for what you
might say about N.A. culture. Please keep it up even if your N.A.
respondents don't get it.
.
- References:
- Re: The Terrific Trio
- From: paul c
- Re: The Terrific Trio
- Prev by Date: Re: The Terrific Trio
- Next by Date: Re: The Terrific Trio
- Previous by thread: Re: The Terrific Trio
- Next by thread: Re: The Terrific Trio
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
