Re: Mixing OO and DB

On 24 fév, 03:23, paul c <toledoby...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Cimode, nice to know you are still alive, if you don't mind a
suggestion, mine would be that your time is better spent working on your
engine than replying to the OO babblers.
It is nice to hear from you also. I did not show up lately for the
exact reasons you suggested. Mixing probabilism and relational
algebra to come up with a decent implementation makes it indeed
difficult to do both. Because I am stuck on a difficult problem with
the compiler for more than a month, I am kind of taking a breath of
fresh air by dropping by...

Your posts on other topics are
usually more entertaining, at least for me. There was a time when the
promoters of IT jargon knew more about useful machinery, ie. technique,
than the people who signed for the computers. With the rapid rise in
illiteracy among technocrats here and elsewhere that time may now be
past, although the cheque signers still don't seem to know it yet. Most
of the cross posters here seem to be confusing technique with purpose.
You especially may find it ironic that many of them appear to be native
English speakers.
Indeed. DIJKRA had identified that close relationship between
mastering of one's native language and computer science proficiency
applied to programming.
.

Relevant Pages