Re: Normalizing Tree Data
- From: TroyK <cs_troyk@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:42:50 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 8, 10:10 am, cr113 <cr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's the simplest way to set up a relationional database with tree<snip - see OP>
data? I'm more interested in simplicity vs speed.
Any help would be appreciated!
You're on the right track in realizing that you have a tradeoff to
make (simplicity vs. speed). However, there are a number of other
design considerations that will also inform the final product.
What are your needs in terms of flexibility, for instance? Is it the
case that the specific "hierarchy" you've outlined is the only one you
need to support?
Re: other design considerations, Graeme Simsion has what I consider to
be a good article here:
http://www.tdan.com/view-articles/5100
People will be able to guide you better if you can expand more on what
criteria are important to you.
TroyK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Normalizing Tree Data
- From: cr113
- Re: Normalizing Tree Data
- References:
- Normalizing Tree Data
- From: cr113
- Normalizing Tree Data
- Prev by Date: Re: 2nd Normal Form Question
- Next by Date: Re: Principle of Orthogonal Design
- Previous by thread: Normalizing Tree Data
- Next by thread: Re: Normalizing Tree Data
- Index(es):