Re: Useful Unicode
- From: JOG <jog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:14:28 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 22, 11:26 pm, JOG <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 22, 10:52 pm, mAsterdam <mAster...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob Badour quoted all of the message, including
references: レ
references unique: ル
masterdam smiley : ☺
to write:
Refernces and references unique both come out as
question marks on this end.
If I did not know better, I'd suggest that this
has to do with overzealous twitfiltersettings.
It is remarkable, that the Unicode /does/ come through
nicely in his message, so my real guess is that the
font he uses for display does not have the Japanese characters.
Mmmm, I was partly interested in how universal these codes are in
getting through people's news-readers. If they are only rendering on
google groups it hinders communication somewhat.
I've checked on thunderbird and firefox, on a mac (naturally...), and
all is well with the unicode world.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Useful Unicode
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Useful Unicode
- References:
- Useful Unicode
- From: JOG
- Re: Useful Unicode
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Useful Unicode
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Useful Unicode
- From: JOG
- Useful Unicode
- Prev by Date: Re: how to suppress carefully a recursive tree
- Next by Date: Re: Principle of Orthogonal Design
- Previous by thread: Re: Useful Unicode
- Next by thread: Re: Useful Unicode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
