comp.databases.theory

Date Index

Functional Dependency algorithm, Jeff
A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, raylopez99
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Marshall
  - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, raylopez99
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Bob Badour
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Tony Toews [MVP]
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, mAsterdam
  - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, raylopez99
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Bob Badour
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, rpl
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, mAsterdam
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, raylopez99
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, mAsterdam
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Bob Badour
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, JOG
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Bob Badour
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, JOG
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Bob Badour
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, Marshall
    - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, David Cressey
  - Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?, raylopez99
What is an automorphism of a database instance?, Kira Yamato
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?, Kira Yamato
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?, Tegiri Nenashi
  - Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?, Bob Badour
  - Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?, Kira Yamato
creating ER diagrams, magawake
A few questions about arxiv paper, Tegiri Nenashi
SAP BASIS Tech Cons, Lionsville PA, 3-4 months ...URGENT REQUIREMENT..., META SENSE SUPPORT
NULLs, stevedtrm
- Re: NULLs, David Cressey
  - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
  - Re: NULLs, stevedtrm
    - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs, stevedtrm
    - Re: NULLs, Roy Hann
    - Re: NULLs, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, paul c
    - Re: NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs, David Cressey
    - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
    - some ado about nothing, mAsterdam
    - Re: NULLs, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs, David BL
    - Re: NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, David BL
    - Re: NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs, David BL
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs, JOG
    - Re: NULLs, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs, mAsterdam
schema help, magawake
- Re: schema help, Rob
  - Re: schema help, magawake
    - Re: schema help, Rob
  - Re: schema help, David BL
    - Re: schema help, Rob
    - Re: schema help, David BL
    - Re: schema help, Rob
  - Re: schema help, Cimode
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem?, Bob Badour
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem?, mAsterdam
which part of IM is this ?, rpl
- Re: which part of IM is this ?, Bob Badour
  - Re: which part of IM is this ?, rpl
Wanna be a DBA?, David Cressey
- Re: Wanna be a DBA?, Jason Lepack
- Re: Wanna be a DBA?, Bob Badour
- Re: Wanna be a DBA?, Jerry Gitomer
  - Re: Wanna be a DBA?, Tony Rogerson
What is a "data sublanguage", David Cressey
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage", Kira Yamato
  - Re: What is a "data sublanguage", Roy Hann
    - Re: What is a "data sublanguage", Kira Yamato
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage", Bob Badour
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage", Knowledgy
Amazon's "Simple" Database, JOG
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, David Cressey
  - Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, Roy Hann
    - Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, Bob Badour
  - Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, JOG
    - Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database, David Cressey
Deadline approaching: Call for book chapters - Proposal Submission Deadline: Dec 31, 2007, Yanchang
Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, raylopez99
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Jerry Gitomer
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Bob Badour
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Roy Hann
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Hugo Kornelis
  - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, raylopez99
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, David Cressey
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Roy Hann
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, David Cressey
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, raylopez99
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, David Cressey
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, raylopez99
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, mAsterdam
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, raylopez99
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, mAsterdam
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, rpl
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?, David Cressey
Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, raylopez99
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, David Portas
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, mAsterdam
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, Bob Badour
  - Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, David Cressey
    - Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, raylopez99
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, Evan Keel
  - Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, mAsterdam
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, David Cressey
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?, raylopez99
Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Kira Yamato
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Kira Yamato
  - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Knowledgy
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Ross Presser
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Kira Yamato
  - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., TroyK
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Kira Yamato
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Jan Hidders
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Kira Yamato
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Jan Hidders
    - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form., Brian Selzer
Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), d-42
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), David Cressey
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), David Cressey
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), Bob Badour
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), jefftyzzer
  - Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), d-42
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...), -CELKO-
Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Dr. Dweeb
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Roy Hann
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Ross Presser
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Anith Sen
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Frank Hamersley
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Sampo Syreeni
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Sampo Syreeni
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Sampo Syreeni
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, paul c
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, paul c
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Frank Hamersley
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Ross Presser
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Dr. Dweeb
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Jonathan Leffler
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Kevin Kirkpatrick
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, JOG
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - what are keys and surrogates?, rpost
    - Re: what are keys and surrogates?, JOG
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Roy Hann
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Tony Rogerson
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, mAsterdam
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, mAsterdam
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, -CELKO-
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Knowledgy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
  - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, rpl
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Cressey
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Brian Selzer
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, raylopez99
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?, Gene Wirchenko
Anyone remember this book?, Evan Keel
- Re: Anyone remember this book?, Bob Badour
- Re: Anyone remember this book?, Roy Hann
  - Re: Anyone remember this book?, -CELKO-
    - Re: Anyone remember this book?, Evan Keel
    - Re: Anyone remember this book?, Brian Selzer
Query independency from updates problem for relational databases, silentser
- Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases, Jan Hidders
  - Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases, silentser
    - Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases, silentser
Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties, Lynn
- Re: Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties, Bob Badour
Call for speakers - SQL Bits 2008; 1st March 2008 Birmingham UK, Tony Rogerson
indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search, xareon
- Message not available
  - Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search, xareon
- Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search, Jonathan Leffler
Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
- I goofed. Replace watering with treatment, David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER, TroyK
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, TroyK
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Ruud de Koter
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Ruud de Koter
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Ruud de Koter
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER), mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: OT editors, mAsterdam
    - Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER), David Cressey
    - Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER), Roy Hann
    - Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER), David Cressey
    - Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER), rpost
    - Re: OT editors, Frank Hamersley
    - Re: OT editors, Roy Hann
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, TroyK
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David BL
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Ruud de Koter
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, dawn
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jonathan Leffler
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, JOG
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, rpost
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, David Cressey
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER, Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER, mAsterdam
Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, rpost
  - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Jonathan Leffler
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, David Cressey
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
    - Message not available
    - Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies, Marshall
What is analysis?, David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis?, Marshall
  - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis?, Jon Heggland
  - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, Bob Badour
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, Bob Badour
    - Re: What is analysis?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, Bob Badour
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, Bob Badour
    - Re: What is analysis?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, TroyK
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Re: What is analysis?, TroyK
    - Re: What is analysis?, rpost
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
    - Message not available
    - Re: What is analysis?, rpost
    - Re: What is analysis?, Keith H Duggar
- Re: What is analysis?, JOG
  - Re: What is analysis?, JOG
- Message not available
  - Re: What is analysis?, David Cressey
Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
  - Re: Help with Ms-Access, David Cressey
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access, Bob Badour
  - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Bob Badour
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Bob Badour
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Bob Badour
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Jeffrey Davis
    - Re: Help with Ms-Access, Bob Badour
- Re: Help with Ms-Access, David Cressey
plz normalize this table for me, M.Shariq
- Re: plz normalize this table for me, Jan Hidders
  - Message not available
    - Re: plz normalize this table for me, Bob Badour
- Re: plz normalize this table for me, David Cressey
- Re: plz normalize this table for me, floronDBA
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
  - Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
    - Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
    - Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
    - Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Tegiri Nenashi
  - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
  - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jon Heggland
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
  - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Dr. Dweeb
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, V.J. Kumar
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Ruud de Koter
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey