Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:58:56 +0100
paul c schreef:
mAsterdam wrote:Nice duck. Are you holding up the claim or are you letting it go?
Thanks, I like ducks because of their character, eg., they will kill a seagull that comes near their young but what have ducks got to do with your opinion which is getting harder and harder to pin down in spite of the volume of messages?
You are letting the claim go. Ok. You brought in the RM. Can we now get back on (sub-)topic? (Facts)
.
- References:
- Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
- Another view on analysis and ER
- Prev by Date: Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- Next by Date: Re: OT editors
- Previous by thread: Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- Next by thread: Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|