comp.databases.theory

Thread Index

Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Tony Toews [MVP]
Re: NULLs
- From: Marshall
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: raylopez99
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: NULLs
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: David Cressey
Re: NULLs
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: NULLs
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: JOG
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: JOG
some ado about nothing
- From: mAsterdam
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: raylopez99
Re: NULLs
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: NULLs
- From: David Cressey
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Marshall
Re: NULLs
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: rpl
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: raylopez99
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: raylopez99
Functional Dependency algorithm
- From: Jeff
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: Marshall
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Sampo Syreeni
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: NULLs
- From: Marshall
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: NULLs
- From: David BL
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
Re: NULLs
- From: mAsterdam
Re: NULLs
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: NULLs
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: NULLs
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: paul c
Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance?
- From: Kira Yamato
What is an automorphism of a database instance?
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: NULLs
- From: Marshall
Re: NULLs
- From: David BL
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: NULLs
- From: David BL
Re: NULLs
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: NULLs
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: NULLs
- From: paul c
Re: NULLs
- From: JOG
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: paul c
Re: NULLs
- From: Marshall
Re: NULLs
- From: Marshall
Re: schema help
- From: Rob
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: rpl
Re: NULLs
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: rpl
Re: NULLs
- From: stevedtrm
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
creating ER diagrams
- From: magawake
Re: schema help
- From: David BL
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: NULLs
- From: stevedtrm
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
A few questions about arxiv paper
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: schema help
- From: Rob
Re: NULLs
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: NULLs
- From: David Cressey
SAP BASIS Tech Cons, Lionsville PA, 3-4 months ...URGENT REQUIREMENT...
- From: META SENSE SUPPORT
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Sampo Syreeni
NULLs
- From: stevedtrm
Re: schema help
- From: Rob
Re: schema help
- From: Cimode
Re: schema help
- From: David BL
Re: schema help
- From: magawake
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
Re: schema help
- From: Rob
schema help
- From: magawake
Re: What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: Knowledgy
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Sampo Syreeni
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David BL
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Frank Hamersley
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Wanna be a DBA?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Frank Hamersley
Re: what are keys and surrogates?
- From: JOG
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
what are keys and surrogates?
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: which part of IM is this ?
- From: rpl
Re: which part of IM is this ?
- From: Bob Badour
which part of IM is this ?
- From: rpl
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Anith Sen
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: Sampo Syreeni
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Wanna be a DBA?
- From: Jerry Gitomer
Re: Wanna be a DBA?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Wanna be a DBA?
- From: Jason Lepack
Re: What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
Re: What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: Kira Yamato
Wanna be a DBA?
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: Kira Yamato
What is a "data sublanguage"
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: David Cressey
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: JOG
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: David Cressey
Amazon's "Simple" Database
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Deadline approaching: Call for book chapters - Proposal Submission Deadline: Dec 31, 2007
- From: Yanchang
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Jonathan Leffler
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Dr. Dweeb
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Dr. Dweeb
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: Jerry Gitomer
Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: Evan Keel
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: TroyK
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Ross Presser
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Ross Presser
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Ross Presser
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Knowledgy
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Knowledgy
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases
- From: silentser
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Portas
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Kira Yamato
Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
- From: Kira Yamato
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: d-42
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: jefftyzzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases
- From: silentser
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: David Cressey
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: David Cressey
Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
- From: d-42
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Anyone remember this book?
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases
- From: Jan Hidders
Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
- From: raylopez99
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER)
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Anyone remember this book?
- From: Evan Keel
Re: Anyone remember this book?
- From: -CELKO-
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: David Cressey
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Anyone remember this book?
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Gene Wirchenko
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Anyone remember this book?
- From: Bob Badour
Anyone remember this book?
- From: Evan Keel
Query independency from updates problem for relational databases
- From: silentser
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: OT editors
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: OT editors
- From: Frank Hamersley
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: dawn
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER)
- From: David Cressey
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER)
- From: Roy Hann
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER)
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: OT editors
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER)
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties
- From: Bob Badour
Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties
- From: Lynn
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Ruud de Koter
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Ruud de Koter
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: TroyK
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: TroyK
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Call for speakers - SQL Bits 2008; 1st March 2008 Birmingham UK
- From: Tony Rogerson
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: mAsterdam
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Marshall
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jonathan Leffler
Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search
- From: Jonathan Leffler
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Jonathan Leffler
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Re: What is analysis?
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: rpost
Re: What is analysis?
- From: rpost
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search
- From: xareon
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search
- From: xareon
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David BL
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: TroyK
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: TroyK
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Brian Selzer
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Ruud de Koter
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Ruud de Koter
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
- From: TroyK
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Bob Badour
I goofed. Replace watering with treatment
- From: David Cressey
Another view on analysis and ER
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: plz normalize this table for me
- From: floronDBA
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Ruud de Koter
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Keith H Duggar
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
Re: What is analysis?
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Dr. Dweeb
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: What is analysis?
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall
Character string relation and functional dependencies
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Bob Badour
Re: What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Jon Heggland
Re: What is analysis?
- From: Marshall
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
What is analysis?
- From: David Cressey
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: plz normalize this table for me
- From: David Cressey
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: David Cressey
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Bob Badour
Re: Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Help with Ms-Access
- From: Jeffrey Davis
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: plz normalize this table for me
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: plz normalize this table for me
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
plz normalize this table for me
- From: M.Shariq
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: V.J. Kumar
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Cimode
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David BL
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: rpost
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David Cressey
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: vldm10
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David BL
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David BL
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: David BL
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: JOG
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Bob Badour
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Tegiri Nenashi
Re: One-To-One Relationships
- From: Marshall