Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL <davidbl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:58:01 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 27, 9:43 pm, Jan Hidders <hidd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26 nov, 15:06, David BL <davi...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:47 pm, Jan Hidders <hidd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26 nov, 08:52, David BL <davi...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Firstly a minor nit pick: you can't say "possible answers", because
they don't actually represent an upper bound on the result in the
omniscient database.
?? They do so by definition.
What I meant was that unless CWA is available on an appropriate
projection there may be so much missing information (eg all
information about an entity) that the query purported to return the
"possible answers" does no such thing. ie it suffers a similar
problem to negation (it returns neither the certain nor the possible
answers).
I'm not sure what you mean by "the query purported to return the
'possible answers'". If the user formulates a query then this will now
include an indication of whether he or she wants the possible/certain
answers. It is up to the DBMS to efficiently compute the answer, and
this is not necessarily done by the usual translation of calculus to
algebra or even one very similar to it.
Consider a query to find all the 27 year old pilots from a census
recorded in an RDB. If the age or occupation is missing we could
think of the person as a possible answer. However we cannot say the
query returns all possible answers unless we assume every person took
part in the census.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- References:
- RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- From: Jan Hidders
- RM formalism supporting partial information
- Prev by Date: Re: the two questions
- Next by Date: Re: the two questions
- Previous by thread: Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- Next by thread: Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|