comp.databases.theory

• Date Index

---

• Please, download our Books (John Sakellaris, Serban Vlaud, Nikos Mastorakis, Olga Martin) from the site: www.wseas.com or www.wseas.org, Kostas I.
• CALL FOR CHAPTERS - Proposal Submission Deadline: Dec 31, 2007, Yanchang
• APPLIED COMPUTING 2008 - Submission Deadline extended, natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• the two questions, vldm10
  • Re: the two questions, Jonathan Leffler
    • Re: the two questions, vldm10
  • Re: the two questions, JOG
    • Re: the two questions, vldm10
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, vldm10
    • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, vldm10
      • Re: the two questions, Bob Badour
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, Marshall
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, thesaboteurs
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, Jon Heggland
      • Re: the two questions, Bob Badour
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, Bob Badour
      • Re: the two questions, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: the two questions, Bob Badour
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, David Cressey
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, Brian Selzer
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
      • Re: the two questions, vldm10
      • Re: the two questions, vldm10
    • Re: the two questions, vldm10
      • Re: the two questions, JOG
• Encrypted databases, Roy Hann
  • Re: Encrypted databases, Cimode
  • Re: Encrypted databases, Gints Plivna
    • Re: Encrypted databases, Roy Hann
      • Re: Encrypted databases, Bob Badour
      • Re: Encrypted databases, Roy Hann
      • Re: Encrypted databases, Bob Badour
• Undefinedness, JOG
  • Re: Undefinedness, David Cressey
    • Re: Undefinedness, JOG
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Undefinedness, joelle . alcock
      • Re: Undefinedness, JOG
      • Re: Undefinedness, David BL
      • Re: Undefinedness, David Cressey
      • Re: Undefinedness, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Undefinedness, Marshall
      • Re: Undefinedness, David Cressey
      • Re: Undefinedness, Bob Badour
  • Re: Undefinedness, Bob Badour
  • Re: Undefinedness, Marshall
    • Re: Undefinedness, JOG
      • Re: Undefinedness, Bob Badour
  • Re: Undefinedness, Cimode
    • Re: Undefinedness, JOG
      • Re: Undefinedness, Cimode
• Re: One-To-One Relationships, Dr. Dweeb
  • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Roy Hann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
    • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Brian Selzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, joelle . alcock
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Brian Selzer
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, vldm10
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David BL
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Marshall
    • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, rpost
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, JOG
      • Re: One-To-One Relationships, Jan Hidders
• RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
  • Message not available
    • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Brian Selzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • The distinction between "is" and "has", David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Joe Thurbon
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Cimode
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Cimode
  • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
    • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
    • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Marshall
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, JOG
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Brian Selzer
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David Cressey
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, vldm10
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM formalism supporting partial information, David BL
• Re: XML storing and management, Bob Badour
• Database Theory basis, mp5 . misha
  • Re: Database Theory basis, David Portas
  • Re: Database Theory basis, JAK
• Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Parker
  • Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Roy Hann
• Re: atomic, Bob Badour
  • Re: atomic, David BL
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: atomic, David Cressey
    • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Re: atomic, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, dawn
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Re: atomic, dawn
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Re: atomic, David Cressey
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Bob Badour
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Re: atomic, Roy Hann
      • Re: atomic, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: atomic, David BL
      • Re: atomic, Gene Wirchenko
• Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Tegiri Nenashi
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Tegiri Nenashi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Gene Wirchenko
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Ed Prochak
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Tegiri Nenashi
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Tegiri Nenashi
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
  • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Ed Prochak
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Ed Prochak
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Message not available
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Ed Prochak
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
      • Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2007-11