Re: atomic
- From: Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:58:48 -0000
On Oct 31, 11:02 am, paul c <toledobythe...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
David BL wrote:
Can that be formalised? I agree with Bob that in general we have a
set of operators and they can allow us to see internal structure.
What does it mean for a value to be *treated* as atomic?
I think it means that relational algebra operators are not allowed to
decompose it.
Nice!!!
Marshall
.
- References:
- Re: atomic
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: atomic
- From: David BL
- Re: atomic
- Prev by Date: Re: atomic
- Next by Date: Re: atomic
- Previous by thread: Re: atomic
- Next by thread: Re: atomic
- Index(es):