comp.databases.theory

Date Index

Re: atomic, Bob Badour
- Message not available
  - Re: atomic, Bob Badour
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: atomic, Roy Hann
  - Re: atomic, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: atomic, Marshall
    - Message not available
    - Re: atomic, Bob Badour
    - Re: atomic, Marshall
    - Re: atomic, Bob Badour
- Re: atomic, Marshall
  - Re: atomic, David Cressey
Circular relationship problem, Arash
- Re: Circular relationship problem, mAsterdam
  - Re: Circular relationship problem, Arash
One-To-One Relationships, Phil Reynolds
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Gints Plivna
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships, SystemError
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Roy Hann
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, Bob Badour
  - Message not available
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships, David Cressey
RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
- Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Roy Hann
  - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David Cressey
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, David BL
    - Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Marshall
- Re: RM and abstract syntax trees, Tegiri Nenashi
Software Testing Resource, jimy.clarke@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Software Testing Resource, Bob Badour
Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Authorised User
- Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Roy Hann
- Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Brian Selzer
  - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Roy Hann
    - Message not available
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Frank Hamersley
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Authorised User
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Bob Badour
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Authorised User
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, David Cressey
  - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, -CELKO-
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Attribute-values in separate table, -CELKO-
  - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, DBMS_Plumber
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Frank Hamersley
MULTICONF-08 Call for papers, john
Types variables and values, David BL
- Re: Types variables and values, Marshall
  - Re: Types variables and values, David BL
Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
- Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, David Portas
  - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, David Portas
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Ed Prochak
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, David Portas
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Message not available
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Roy Hann
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
- Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
  - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, TroyK
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, David Cressey
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Cimode
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Bob Badour
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, dutone
    - Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?, Bob Badour
New to the job, nujcharee
- Re: New to the job, Ed Prochak
Entities and relationships, Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Entities and relationships, Bob Badour
Enterprise Data Architecture, Parker
- Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Bob Badour
  - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Roy Hann
  - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Bob Badour
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Cimode
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Tony D
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Bob Badour
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Cimode
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Alfredo Novoa
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: Enterprise Data Architecture, Roy Hann
Computer Security Information, admiz . kumar . com . use
Re: separation of church and state?, Roy Hann
- Re: separation of church and state?, David Cressey
  - Re: separation of church and state?, Bob Badour
- Re: separation of church and state?, Marshall
  - Re: separation of church and state?, Roy Hann
    - Message not available
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Marshall
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Bob Badour
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Marshall
    - Message not available
    - Re: separation of church and state?, David Cressey
- Message not available
  - Re: separation of church and state?, Cimode
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: separation of church and state?, David Cressey
  - Message not available
    - Re: separation of church and state?, David Cressey
  - Message not available
    - Re: separation of church and state?, David Cressey
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: sql tables, David Cressey
    - Re: sql tables, Bob Badour
    - Re: sql tables, David Cressey
    - Re: sql tables, Dr. Dweeb
    - Re: sql tables, Roy Hann
    - Re: sql tables, David Cressey
    - Re: sql tables, Roy Hann
    - Re: sql tables, David Cressey
    - Re: sql tables, Roy Hann
    - Message not available
    - Re: sql tables, David Cressey
    - Re: sql tables, Marshall
  - Re: separation of church and state?, David Portas
  - Re: separation of church and state?, Bob Badour
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Cimode
  - Message not available
    - Re: separation of church and state?, Dr. Dweeb
- Re: separation of church and state?, Marshall
  - Re: separation of church and state?, Dr. Dweeb
- Re: separation of church and state?, Dr. Dweeb
Re: XML storing and management, djmcmahon
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: XML storing and management, djmcmahon
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched, Cimode
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched, Cimode
Schema Relationship Question, JamesHoward
- Re: Schema Relationship Question, JOG
  - Re: Schema Relationship Question, Ed Prochak
    - Re: Schema Relationship Question, JamesHoward
    - Re: Schema Relationship Question, David Portas
- Re: Schema Relationship Question, David Portas
Re: how to query for time based inventory status, Tonkuma
Setting up updatable views ?, Cimode
- Re: Setting up updatable views ?, JOG
  - Re: Setting up updatable views ?, Cimode
- Re: Setting up updatable views ?, -CELKO-
  - Re: Setting up updatable views ?, Jon Heggland
I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes.., Evan Keel
- Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes.., Marshall
- Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes.., mAsterdam
  - Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes.., Marshall
- Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes.., JOG