comp.databases.theory

Date Index

Attribute-values in separate table, anjasmedts
- Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Bob Badour
  - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, anjasmedts
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Bob Badour
    - Re: Attribute-values in separate table, David Cressey
- Re: Attribute-values in separate table, Neo
Prescriptive design rules, Evan Keel
- Re: Prescriptive design rules, Evan Keel
- Re: Prescriptive design rules, Bob Badour
  - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Evan Keel
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Marshall
    - Message not available
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, David Cressey
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, JOG
- Re: Prescriptive design rules, Evan Keel
  - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Bob Badour
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Evan Keel
    - Re: Prescriptive design rules, Bob Badour
Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Kevin Kirkpatrick
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
  - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
  - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Message not available
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Bob Badour
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, mAsterdam
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, mAsterdam
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
  - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Brian Selzer
- Message not available
  - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
- Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, mAsterdam
  - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, mAsterdam
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, mAsterdam
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, JOG
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, David Cressey
    - Re: Multiple-Attribute Keys and 1NF, Neo
normalization review, landonkelsey
- Re: normalization review, Bob Badour
  - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey
    - Re: normalization review, paul c
- Re: normalization review, Evan Keel
  - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey
    - Re: normalization review, Bob Badour
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey
    - Re: normalization review, Bob Badour
    - Re: normalization review, David Cressey
    - Re: normalization review, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: normalization review, Jan Hidders
    - Re: normalization review, Brian Selzer
    - Re: normalization review, Bob Badour
    - Re: normalization review, paul c
- Re: normalization review, Larry Coon
  - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: normalization review, Larry Coon
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, David Portas
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, Bob Badour
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
    - Re: normalization review, landonkelsey via DBMonster.com
Request into several DBMS simultaneously on DDL and DML, Dmitry Turin
Application development with Dataphor, steve
Cull the Crap, Rob
- Re: Cull the Crap, Bruce C. Baker
  - Re: Cull the Crap, DBMS_Plumber
    - Re: Cull the Crap, Bruce C. Baker
- Re: Cull the Crap, Bob Badour
- Re: Cull the Crap, sinister
  - Re: Cull the Crap, JOG
    - Message not available
    - Re: Cull the Crap, JOG
PAK Host Online(PHO): Web Hosting, Free Domain Registration /Transfer, Website Builder & Web Marketing in Pakistan, Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad & Rawalpindi at http://www.pakhostonline.com/, koom2020
Search Engine Optimization ( SEO ) and Web Marketing Services in Pakistan, Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad and Rawalpindi!, koom2052
Relationship(s) for human family structure, woger151
- Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Neo
- Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Neo
- Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Rob
  - Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Tegiri Nenashi
    - Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, JOG
    - Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Neo
  - Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Neo
  - Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, Neo
- Re: Relationship(s) for human family structure, -CELKO-
Re: standard and easy way to do schema design, -CELKO-
Internet: request + transport = invariant, html60
Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, beginner16
- Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, Doug_McMahon
- Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, Jan Hidders
  - Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, beginner16
    - Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, beginner16
    - Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, Jan Hidders
- Re: Some really confusing things about parent-child relationship, Neo
DATA MINING: Use of modern heuristics to transform and select regressors for linear modelling, Shah
- Re: DATA MINING: Use of modern heuristics to transform and select regressors for linear modelling, Cimode
  - Re: DATA MINING: Use of modern heuristics to transform and select regressors for linear modelling, Cimode
Weak entity types, beginner16
- Re: Weak entity types, Bob Badour
  - Re: Weak entity types, beginner16
    - Re: Weak entity types, Bob Badour
    - Re: Weak entity types, David Cressey
    - Re: Weak entity types, Bob Badour
    - Re: Weak entity types, Jan Hidders
- Re: Weak entity types, Evan Keel
- Re: Weak entity types, JOG
- Re: Weak entity types, Hugo Kornelis
  - Message not available
    - Re: Weak entity types, JOG
  - Message not available
    - Re: Weak entity types, David Cressey
    - Re: Weak entity types, Bob Badour
  - Message not available
    - Re: Weak entity types, Gene Wirchenko
Download new Cartesian Database, mauro . guazzo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Download new Cartesian Database, mauro . guazzo
Purdue University Asst. Research Professor position available, Jeff Vitter
IS components and categories, beginner16
- Re: IS components and categories, Bob Badour
  - Re: IS components and categories, beginner16
    - Re: IS components and categories, Mudit
Re: attribute name conflicts, Doug_McMahon
- Message not available
  - Re: attribute name conflicts, Bob Badour
    - Re: attribute name conflicts, Gene Wirchenko
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: attribute name conflicts, Doug_McMahon
  - Re: attribute name conflicts, Brian Selzer
Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, sinister
- Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Bob Badour
  - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
    - Message not available
    - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
    - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Christopher Browne
    - Message not available
    - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
    - Message not available
    - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
- Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Marshall
  - Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
- Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Practical considerations of dealing with two meanings of NULLs, Doug_McMahon
NULLs: theoretical problems?, sinister
- Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Joe Thurbon
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Joe Thurbon
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
- Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Cressey
- Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Hugo Kornelis
  - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Lennart
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Aloha Kakuikanu
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Cimode
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Cimode
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Hugo Kornelis
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Eric
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Eric
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, -CELKO-
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Eric
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
- Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
  - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Hugo Kornelis
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Keith H Duggar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Keith H Duggar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Keith H Duggar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jon Heggland
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Marshall
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, V.J. Kumar
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Evan Keel
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Jan Hidders
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Neo
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Ed Prochak
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Neo
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Neo
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Cressey
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Brian Selzer
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, Bob Badour
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, David Portas
    - Message not available
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
    - Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?, JOG
finding duplicate records with typo's, tom
- Re: finding duplicate records with typo's, Bob Badour
  - Re: finding duplicate records with typo's, tom
- Re: finding duplicate records with typo's, Marshall
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., paul c
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Jan Hidders
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., David Cressey
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Bob Badour
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Bob Badour
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Bob Badour
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Gene Wirchenko
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Bob Badour
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., JOG
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object., Brian Selzer
Cardinality - I really need help, beginner16
- Re: Cardinality - I really need help, David Cressey
- Re: Cardinality - I really need help, Hugo Kornelis
  - Re: Cardinality - I really need help, beginner16
    - Re: Cardinality - I really need help, David Cressey
  - Re: Cardinality - I really need help, Ross Presser
    - Re: Cardinality - I really need help, Hugo Kornelis
Re: Is inner query executed for each row of ... ?, beginner16
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is inner query executed for each row of ... ?, -CELKO-
Re: Sixth normal form, Sameeksha
- Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
  - Re: Sixth normal form, vldm10
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, vldm10
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, vldm10
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
  - Re: Sixth normal form, paul c
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, paul c
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Bruce C. Baker
    - Re: Sixth normal form, paul c
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Bruce C. Baker
    - Re: Sixth normal form, David Cressey
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
  - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Paul Mansour
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, JOG
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, JOG
    - Message not available
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, JOG
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, JOG
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, JOG
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Sixth normal form, David Cressey
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
    - Message not available
    - Re: Sixth normal form, Brian Selzer
- Re: Sixth normal form, Neo