comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is inner query executed for each row of ... ?
  • From: kschendel
• Re: Sixth normal form
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Is inner query executed for each row of ... ?
  • From: beginner16
• Re: Sixth normal form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Sixth normal form
  • From: Sameeksha
• Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*...
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Sixth normal form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Sixth normal form
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*...
  • From: David Cressey
• Sixth normal form
  • From: Sameeksha
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: data mining of subsets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: paul c
• Re: data mining of subsets
  • From: max
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: paul c
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: data mining of subsets
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• data mining of subsets
  • From: max
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Paul Mansour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data
  • From: Paul
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data
  • From: Martin T .
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Subtyping as an alternative to references
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data
  • From: Evan Keel
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: beginner16
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Paul Mansour
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data
  • From: Neo
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: paul c
• Help with Design and Obtaining of Data
  • From: paulwragg2323
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: JOG
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: JOG
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: JOG
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: paul c
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: paul c
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: beginner16
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: paul c
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Neo
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure
  • From: beginner16
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: beginner16
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: beginner16
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: beginner16
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Cimode
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ?
  • From: beginner16
• Bachman diagrams and E-R model
  • From: beginner16
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: JOG
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Nis Jørgensen
• Re: Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: JOG
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: joelle . alcock
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: paul c
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: vldm10
• Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: mAsterdam
• Object-oriented SQL statements
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value
  • From: arthursable
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: OR operator in D&D algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• OR operator in D&D algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model...
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: TroyK
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model...
  • From: David Portas
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Joins vs. Sub-Selects
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: TroyK
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Joins vs. Sub-Selects
  • From: perryv
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: TroyK
• Fabian Pascal, completely different?
  • From: Paul Mansour
• I still don't understand whether the term data model...
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Nis Jørgensen
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Cimode
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Lennart
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: David Portas
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: question using aggregate function
  • From: David Portas
• question using aggregate function
  • From: Mia
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: paul c
• Re: A simple notation, again
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• A simple notation, again
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost
  • From: kaja_love160
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• B+ tree: How to obtain key from value
  • From: Dimitry
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: paul c
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Lennart
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
  • From: Cimode
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Nis Jørgensen
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Mike
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Mike
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Roy Hann
• performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Lennart
• Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Lennart
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: David Portas
• difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz?
  • From: Sune
• Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: paul c
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A Simple Notation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• A Simple Notation
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: dreamznatcher
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: dreamznatcher
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: DA Morgan
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: DM Unseen
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bob Badour
• What happened to Dali/Datablitz?
  • From: Sune
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Bruce C. Baker
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Roy Hann
• what exactly is the conceptual model?
  • From: Senges
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Sune
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Sune
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Sune
• Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Career questions: databases
  • From: Cimode
• How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint?
  • From: Sune

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)