Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)


"Bob Badour" <bbadour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4658dd25$0$4028$9a566e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bruce C. Baker wrote:
"Bob Badour" <bbadour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4658bf81$0$4043$9a566e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Matthias Klaey wrote:


Bob Badour <bbadour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Matthias Klaey wrote:


Cimode <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi,

Chapter 2 of the little things that can be done at little cost to
avoid misconceptions about RM design.

Lately, I opened a thread that gave opportunity for CELKO to post the
exact essence of what should *not* be done in design: let
subjectiveness regulate design instead of logic. I take the
opportunity of his thread to point out how and why it is wiser to
ignore such ideas to build better databases. For that I will take
all
the posted comments and try to make sense out of them.

Regard...

[...]

Hmm. Is this just the usual Celko-bashing in this newsgroup? Did you
intend to write a parody on how to misread and misinterpert other
peoples texts? You don't mean this seriously, do you?

Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere. You seem to object to
debunking idiots.

"Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere": This is *your
opinion* about Celko. I happen to disagree with you (end of *this*
discussion from my part).

That Celko is an idiot is a factual matter and not opinion at all.

For those of us who are coming a little late to the "Celko is an idiot"
thread, could you give a few details about the dimensions of his idiocy?
TIA.

groups.google.com

I was kinda looking for specifics, Bob; in particular, why /you/ consider
Celko to be an idiot.

At this point, I'm only curious. I'm certainly not defending the man--as if
he needed defending by the likes of me! I'd hate to see this evolve into
what we in another NG refer to as a "Provide Proof Or Retract" challenge.



.

Relevant Pages