Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:06:31 GMT
V.J. Kumar wrote:
paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
RqcYh.132205$DE1.59908@pd7urf2no:">news:RqcYh.132205$DE1.59908@pd7urf2no:
V.J. Kumar wrote:
Then there is no way to determine whether or not it was paid and your
question cannot be answered in principle ! Of course, you can use
some other attribute name to reflect the invoice status, like
'status' for example.
vj
If Invoice had no "paid" attribute, I presume there would be a
Payments relation.
Whatever it is, you can easily derive 'paid' from that 'whatever' and
just go from there as if you had the 'paid' atttribute. I am not sure
what else I can add to that ...
vj
Thanks, bad example I guess, will try to think of better ones.
p
.
- References:
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: paul c
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: paul c
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: V.J. Kumar
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: paul c
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: V.J. Kumar
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: paul c
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- From: V.J. Kumar
- Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- Prev by Date: Re: Newbie question on table design.
- Next by Date: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
- Next by thread: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|