Quote from comp.object
- From: "frebe" <frebe73@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2007 07:09:17 -0800
"A typical SQL DBMS requires _drastically_ faster hardware than a
hierarchical database to provide even roughly equivalent response time
-- to the point that a SQL DBMS running on current hardware is about
the
same speed (or slighthly slower) than a hierarchical database was
around
25 years ago, running on hardware that was current at the time.
As far as normalization goes: back then, normalization was a way of
life
-- normalization reduces redundancy, and given the cost of storage at
the time, redundancy was _expensive_ (even ignoring inflation, one
month's rent on a 1.8 GB disk drive in 1982 would buy enough disks for
quite a large RAID today). "
Any comments?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quote from comp.object
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Quote from comp.object
- From: DBMS_Plumber
- Re: Quote from comp.object
- From: Marshall
- Re: Quote from comp.object
- Prev by Date: Re: Designing database tables for performance?
- Next by Date: Re: Quote from comp.object
- Previous by thread: NULLS equals NULLS ?
- Next by thread: Re: Quote from comp.object
- Index(es):