Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: "Cimode" <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Feb 2007 02:47:19 -0800
On 25 fév, 02:50, "Marshall" <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 24, 11:28 am, paul c <toledobythe...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:[Snipped]
Good intuition. See alternate formal definition proposed.
Specifically I defined a particular kind of FD which is equivalent
to a candidate key. An FD in turn being a particular kind
of constraint.
Hmmm. Can we express keyness otherwise? I can't think how.
Marshall
.
- References:
- Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Marshall
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: paul c
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Cimode
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: paul c
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Marshall
- Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Prev by Date: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Next by Date: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Previous by thread: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Next by thread: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Index(es):