Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:01:45 GMT
Marshall wrote:
On Feb 24, 11:28 am, paul c <toledobythe...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
It looked to me as if the OP did define it. I've seen the same
definition expressed in equivalent algebra here many moons ago.
Specifically I defined a particular kind of FD which is equivalent
to a candidate key. An FD in turn being a particular kind
of constraint.
Hmmm. Can we express keyness otherwise? I can't think how.
SOL (I'm suspect), but that's another topic, as far as most people are concerned. I don't say it's better, just that I haven't seen anybody yet say why it's worse.
p
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Cimode
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- References:
- Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Marshall
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: paul c
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Cimode
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: paul c
- Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- From: Marshall
- Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Prev by Date: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Next by Date: Re: range remove in BTree, or other table storage
- Previous by thread: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Next by thread: Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
- Index(es):