Re: Objects and Relations
- From: "Marshall" <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2007 18:55:39 -0800
On Jan 30, 6:32 am, "David BL" <davi...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 6:33 pm, "Marshall" <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does it still seem so after reading the above?
Yes!
Hmmm. I wrote up a lengthy reply to the above this morning; this
evening I don't see it on google groups. Did *anyone* see it,
or did it disappear into the ether(net)? I justified the use
of nested relations, gave a pointer to a Stroustroup quote
on language comparison, various other things.
Marshall
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Objects and Relations
- References:
- Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Marshall
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: Marshall
- Re: Objects and Relations
- From: David BL
- Objects and Relations
- Prev by Date: Re: Objects and Relations
- Next by Date: Re: Objects and Relations
- Previous by thread: Re: Objects and Relations
- Next by thread: Re: Objects and Relations
- Index(es):