comp.databases.theory

Date Index

Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, pamelafluente
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, FreeData
  - Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, pamelafluente
    - Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, pamelafluente
    - Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, Alexandr Savinov
    - Message not available
    - Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, Alexandr Savinov
    - Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?, pamelafluente
Multiple keys and transition constraints, Brian Selzer
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints, JOG
  - Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints, J M Davitt
    - Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints, J M Davitt
Nested structures, dawn
- Re: Nested structures, Rob
  - Re: Nested structures, Bob Badour
DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations, littldo@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations, FreeData
I have no blog, -CELKO-
- Re: I have no blog, Evan Keel
  - Re: I have no blog, Larry Coon
    - Re: I have no blog, Evan Keel
    - Re: I have no blog, Bob Badour
3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Karen Hill
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, frosty
  - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, JOG
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Roy Hann
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, paul c
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Evan Keel
  - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Evan Keel
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Paul
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, JOG
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Paul
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, David Portas
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Alexandr Savinov
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, David Portas
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Damien
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Alexandr Savinov
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, JOG
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, paul c
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Paul
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, paul c
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, paul c
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Cimode
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Paul
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Bob Badour
    - Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, paul c
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?, Alexandr Savinov
Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Faisal
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Bob Badour
  - Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Marshall
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Roy Hann
  - Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Keith H Duggar
    - Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining, Frank Hamersley
On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, David Cressey
  - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Bob Badour
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, David Cressey
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Bob Badour
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
  - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, David Cressey
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
  - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Roy Hann
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't, David Cressey
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Dan
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Bob Badour
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Johnny
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Johnny
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Bob Badour
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Cimode
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Jan Hidders
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Alexandr Savinov
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Alexandr Savinov
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, Jan Hidders
    - Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem, pamelafluente
abstraction of table relationships, Marshall
- Re: abstraction of table relationships, Alexandr Savinov
- Re: abstraction of table relationships, Jan Hidders
  - Re: abstraction of table relationships, Dan
- Re: abstraction of table relationships, Cimode
  - Re: abstraction of table relationships, JOG
    - Re: abstraction of table relationships, Cimode
- Re: abstraction of table relationships, Bob Badour
- Re: abstraction of table relationships, David Cressey
  - Re: abstraction of table relationships, Bob Badour
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing, mrettig
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing, Jan Hidders
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing, -CELKO-
Terminology question, pamelafluente
- Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
  - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
    - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
    - Re: Terminology question, Marshall
    - Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question, Jonathan Leffler
  - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
  - Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question, Cimode
- Re: Terminology question, David Cressey
  - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question, David Cressey
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, mAsterdam
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Cimode
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Bob Badour
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Cimode
    - cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), mAsterdam
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), Cimode
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), pamelafluente
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), Cimode
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), pamelafluente
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), Cimode
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), pamelafluente
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), Cimode
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), pamelafluente
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), pamelafluente
    - Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question), Cimode
    - Re: Book advertising, pamelafluente
    - Re: Book advertising, Cimode
    - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question, Cimode
    - Re: Terminology question, Bob Badour
    - Re: Terminology question, Marshall
    - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
    - Re: Terminology question, Marshall
    - Re: Terminology question, pamelafluente
- Re: Terminology question, erk
Order details table reference live data, Johan Sjöström
- Re: Order details table reference live data, Bob Badour
  - Re: Order details table reference live data, Johan Sjöström
    - Re: Order details table reference live data, Bob Badour
- Re: Order details table reference live data, David Cressey
- Re: Order details table reference live data, David Cressey
- Re: Order details table reference live data, Alexandr Savinov
  - Re: Order details table reference live data, Johan Sjöström
- Re: Order details table reference live data, Cimode
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, erk
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Marshall
  - Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, J M Davitt
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Keith H Duggar
  - Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Marshall
  - Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints, Jan Hidders
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, paul c
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, vc
  - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Bob Badour
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, vc
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jon Heggland
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Bob Badour
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, JOG
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, vc
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, vc
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Jan Hidders
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, J M Davitt
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Sampo Syreeni
    - Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables, Brian Selzer