Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: "David Cressey" <dcressey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:10:39 GMT
"Bob Badour" <bbadour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:421Mg.10694$9u.152542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David Cressey wrote:chance
completely on normalized data as a starting place. I've never had a
to apply Inmon's ideas, so I can't compare them to Kimball's ideas.
I will say, however that dismissing either one of them as ignorant and
unprofessional only shows how little the person doing the dismissing
actually knows.
If you insist.
Yes, Bob, I do insist.
If you'd like to make a case to the contrary, go ahead.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- References:
- On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: David Cressey
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Bob Badour
- On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- Prev by Date: Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- Next by Date: Re: abstraction of table relationships
- Previous by thread: Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- Next by thread: Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- Index(es):