comp.databases.theory
- Re: Nested structures
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Nested structures
- From: Rob
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Dan
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: paul c
- Re: I have no blog
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: I have no blog
- From: Evan Keel
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Paul
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: JOG
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: paul c
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: FreeData
- Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
- From: pamelafluente
- Multiple keys and transition constraints
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Johnny
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- Re: I have no blog
- From: Larry Coon
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Damien
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: David Portas
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Jan Hidders
- Nested structures
- From: dawn
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: paul c
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: JOG
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
- From: FreeData
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Johnny
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: David Portas
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Paul
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Paul
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: Cimode
- DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
- From: littldo@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: paul c
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: paul c
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: JOG
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Paul
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: JOG
- Re: I have no blog
- From: Evan Keel
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Evan Keel
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Keith H Duggar
- I have no blog
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Evan Keel
- Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: frosty
- 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
- From: Karen Hill
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: David Cressey
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Marshall
- Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Bob Badour
- Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
- From: Faisal
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: David Cressey
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: David Cressey
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: David Cressey
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Cimode
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Book advertising
- From: Cimode
- Re: Book advertising
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: Cimode
- On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
- From: Cimode
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Dan
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: Cimode
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Cimode
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: abstraction of table relationships
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: Cimode
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- abstraction of table relationships
- From: Marshall
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Marshall
- cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: Cimode
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: Cimode
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Cimode
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Terminology question
- From: David Cressey
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Terminology question
- From: erk
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Terminology question
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Cimode
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Cimode
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Jonathan Leffler
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: mrettig
- Re: Terminology question
- From: Bob Badour
- Terminology question
- From: pamelafluente
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Johan Sjöström
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Johan Sjöström
- Re: Order details table reference live data
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Order details table reference live data
- From: Johan Sjöström
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: erk
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
