Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: "Jan Hidders" <hidders@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 04:18:23 -0700
Jon Heggland wrote:
To sum up: A good RDBMS should be able to infer FDs from keys /
uniqueness constraints (and inclusion dependencies), and reason about
them; in particular, to infer FDs (and thus keys) for arbitrary relation
expressions, e.g. in order to perform semantic optimisation.
On the other hand, in general the implication problem for INDs and FDs
is undecidable.
-- Jan Hidders
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- References:
- Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- Prev by Date: Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- Next by Date: Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- Previous by thread: Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- Next by thread: Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- Index(es):