Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Jon Heggland <jon.heggland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:00:48 +0200
David Cressey wrote:
PMFJI. I've allways been disturbed by the presentation of 4NF in the
"puppies & tricks" poster. It seems to me that there's a misprint,
somewhere, or that the key of one of the tables has undergone a shift
between the 3NF example and the 4NF example. Am I the only one who sees a
problem, or has this been discussed before?
The keys (assuming /italics/ indicate keys) are wrong. It would make
more sense if the key for the initial allegedly non-4NF "Puppy Tricks"
were { Puppy Number, Trick ID, Costume }, and the the key for "Puppy
Costumes" were { Puppy Number, Costume }, but the explanation is still
bad. As presented, it looks more like an example of 2NF than 4NF.
--
Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- References:
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: David Cressey
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- Prev by Date: Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- Next by Date: Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- Previous by thread: Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- Next by thread: Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- Index(es):