comp.databases.theory
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Composed UID -- beginner's question
- From: geos
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- CFP for the ICDT workshop in Emerging Research Opportunities in Web Data Managament
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: paul c
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: JOG
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: JOG
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Jon Heggland
- Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
- From: Marshall
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Marshall
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Matthias Klaey
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Matthias Klaey
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Marshall
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Alexandr Savinov
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Jan Hidders
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: Theo
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: michael
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: David Cressey
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: David Cressey
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: integer id columns for all tables
- From: Bob Badour
- integer id columns for all tables
- From: garhone
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: representing summarize via basic operators
- From: paul c
- Re: representing summarize via basic operators
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- representing summarize via basic operators
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: David Cressey
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: brian
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: David Cressey
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: kvnkrkptrck
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: vc
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: The C in ACID
- From: paul c
- The C in ACID
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: paul c
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Erwin
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: vc
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Portas
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Portas
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Portas
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Erwin
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Erwin
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Portas
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Marshall
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: JOG
- Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: David Portas
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Vadim Tropashko
- Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: David Cressey
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: How to force two entities to point to the same lookup value
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: How to force two entities to point to the same lookup value
- From: paul c
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: David Cressey
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Dan
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: anithsen
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Erwin
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: anithsen
- Re: A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: anithsen
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- A statement on dbdebunk.
- From: Erwin
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type extra
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: A real world example
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: David Cressey
- Re: A real world example
- From: paul c
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: How to force two entities to point to the same lookup value
- From: paul c
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: paul c
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Marshall
- Re: Trying to define Surrogates
- From: erk
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Trying to define surrogates
- From: JOG
- Trying to define Surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Trying to define surrogates
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: paul c
- Re: A real world example
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Notions of Type
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: anithsen
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Notions of Type
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: kvnkrkptrck
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Looking for DA's and DBA's in the midwest to assist an early stage startup
- From: oracle_man@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: David Cressey
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Is there a book that...
- From: jjoensuu
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: anithsen
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: anithsen
- Re: View challenge
- From: paul c
- Re: View challenge
- From: Cimode
- Natural Language --> Integer Value
- From: smonroe
- Re: View challenge
- From: paul c
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: View challenge
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: View challenge
- From: paul c
- Re: View challenge
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: View challenge
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A real world example
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: View challenge
- From: frebe73
- Re: View challenge
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: View challenge
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: View challenge
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: View challenge
- From: frebe73
- Re: View challenge
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: View challenge
- From: frebe73
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: A real world example
- From: JOG
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: erk
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Looking for DA's and DBA's in the midwest to assist an early stage startup
- From: codecowboy
- Re: A real world example
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Database wide constraint?
- From: Lennart
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: View challenge
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Cressey
- View challenge
- From: frebe73
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Erwin
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: TroyK
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: JOG
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: JOG
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Portas
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: frosty
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- A real world example
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Erwin
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Portas
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: David Portas
- Re: Database wide constraint?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Erwin
- Re: Database wide constraint?
- From: J M Davitt
- Why bother with Logical data model?
- From: Broons Bane
- Re: Database wide constraint?
- From: Erwin
- Re: Books
- From: Paolo
- Database wide constraint?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Books
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: dawn
- Re: SQL colum names conventions!
- From: NoEmailsPlease
- Re: Books
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: paul c
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: erk
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Marshall
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: paul c
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Books
- From: erk
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: Books
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Bob Badour
- Books
- From: Paolo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: Table driven mail merge
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: David Cressey
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: JOG
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Dan
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Dan
- Re: Table driven mail merge
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: erk
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: JOG
- Re: Foreign superkey support
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Foreign superkey support
- From: Jon Heggland
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: JOG
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Table driven mail merge
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Erwin
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Erwin
- Re: Table driven mail merge
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Dan
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Table driven mail merge
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Frank Hamersley
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Cimode
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: No more dbs about SOCIAL NETWORKS
- From: Cimode
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: David Cressey
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: David Cressey
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Table driven mail merge
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: user role can customize terms used to filter out data
- From: quadmore
- user role can customize terms used to filter out data
- From: quadmore
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: No more dbs about SOCIAL NETWORKS
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: David Cressey
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: Looking for some design inspiration
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: No more dbs about SOCIAL NETWORKS
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- No more dbs about SOCIAL NETWORKS
- From: Mauricio Nivaldo Andres Monsalve Moreno
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Design question
- From: Free Data Advise
- Re: Looking for some design inspiration
- From: bob
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: erk
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: JOG
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Erwin
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Erwin
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Erwin
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Looking for some design inspiration
- From: exits funnel
- Re: VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: paul c
- VAT rate or VAT amount as a column?
- From: Emily Jones
- Re: Deferred constraint checking
- From: paul c
- Re: Deferred constraint checking
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: Design question
- From: Cimode
- Re: Design question
- From: Cimode
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Cimode
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Design question
- From: disturbedOne
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: vc
- Re: Deferred constraint checking
- From: vc
- Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Resiliency To New Data Requirements
- From: Neo
- Deferred constraint checking
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: erk
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Dan
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: paul c
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: sets of sets
- From: paul c
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: paul c
- Re: computational model of transactions
- From: Cimode
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- computational model of transactions
- From: Marshall
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: paul c
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Marshall
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: erk
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: JOG
- Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- The Database that Understands What It's Told
- From: smonroe
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: sets of sets
- From: David Cressey
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Andy Dingley
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: kvnkrkptrck
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- publically accessible SQL databases
- From: Rob
- Re: Techie Stuff ...
- From: Marshall
- [SPAM] Re: Techie Stuff ...
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Techie Stuff ...
- From: Cimode
- Re: sets of sets
- From: Cimode
- Re: sets of sets
- From: Erwin
- Re: Flashes of Light on the Faith
- From: Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Flashes of Light on the Faith
- From: booktwo
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: paul c
- Re: sets of sets
- From: paul c
- Re: sets of sets
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Gints Plivna
- Re: SQL colum names conventions!
- From: Gints Plivna
- Re: sets of sets
- From: Cimode
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: sets of sets
- From: dawn
- Re: SQL colum names conventions!
- From: mail
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: SQL colum names conventions!
- From: Marshall
- SQL colum names conventions!
- From: mail
- sets of sets
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: ER Diagram Help
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: ER Diagram Help
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Cimode
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Tony Andrews
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: ER Diagram Help
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Tonkuma
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Marshall
- Re: ER Diagram Help
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: J M Davitt
- ER Diagram Help
- From: maccessgirl
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Ben-Michael Schueler
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: kvnkrkptrck
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Bob Badour
- How to update multiple rows atomically
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Anith Sen
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: Erwin
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Essay on Silver Bullets
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: dawn
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: B Faux
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: paul c
- Re: model inherited object
- From: deja
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Anith Sen
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: michael
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: kvnkrkptrck
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Establishing a relationship with the unknown
- From: michael
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Craig Alexander Morrison
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: J M Davitt
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Techie Stuff ...
- From: writehere
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: romantercero
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: erk
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Andy Dingley
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Tony D
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Tony D
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Neo
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: paul c
- Re: why hierarchy?
- From: Bob Badour
- why hierarchy?
- From: JOG
- (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
- From: mAsterdam
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: Neo
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: dawn
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: michael
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: dxuranus
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Paul
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Kenneth Downs
- One PostDoc position available beginning September 1, 2006
- From: Jens Schulze
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Cimode
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: David Cressey
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Alfredo Novoa
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Dan
- How will schemas be affected by nested relations?
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Paul
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Alfredo Novoa
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: vc
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Tony D
- Re: MVCC implementation
- From: Cimode
- MVCC implementation
- From: Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Dan
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators
- From: -CELKO-
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: dxuranus
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Paul
- Technology Sourcing Solutions that work!
- From: itrelations
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: erk
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: romantercero
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Damien
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: David Cressey
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: dxuranus
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators
- From: FRAN
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Damien
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators
- From: Jay Dee
- Re: Database design ideas or templates...
- From: Jay Dee
- SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators
- From: FRAN
- Database design ideas or templates...
- From: romantercero
- A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question
- From: mathlover
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Tony D
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Rich Ryan
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: erk
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant
- From: erk
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant
- From: Dave Conrad
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Roy Hann
- Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
- From: Paul Mansour
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Marshall
- Re: a problem about database modeling
- From: Neo
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: erk
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Tony D
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
- From: Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations
- From: Marshall
