Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)


Aloha Kakuikanu wrote:
Cimode wrote:
In general, relvars themselves, as opposed to their projections .

By "projection" you don't mean RA projection, or do you?
What does RA stand for?
I mean relvars projections from multidimensional representation to
bidimensional representation as Rtables.

BTW, Bourbakism is the worst thing that happened to math in 20th
century.
That's an opinion I respect but I do not quite agree with because it is
simplyistic.

Because of its associative structure, early century Bourbakism math
showed some fuzziness but it has been reaching maturity in the sixties
with very rigorous formalism. Do not forget that we owe to Bourbakism
very important axioms and symbolic (*Whatever x*, *belong to* math
operator). But Bourbakism is not the issue here...I am interested in
your insight about the topic brought up which is relvar
characterization.

Feel free to refer to other mathematics tools to help deal with the
question of relvar nature.

.