Re: A good book
- From: Chris Smith <cdsmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:50:09 -0600
paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
a) if 'elegant' means minimal (what I like to think even though I've
known people who thought it meant terse or symmetrical or somehow
pretty) a lot of bright philosphers over a lot of years managed to get
the common understanding of fopl notation and operators down to a pretty
small/minimal set (nand/nor, exists, forall). that seems promising for
minimal code.
Since we're discussing Dijkstra, of course, elegant means "ingeniously
simple and effective". :)
In any case, I'm not trying to start a newsgroup debate, although I'd
read one if it started. I'm just looking for background material.
--
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer / Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
.
- References:
- A good book
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: A good book
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A good book
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: A good book
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A good book
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: A good book
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: A good book
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: A good book
- From: paul c
- A good book
- Prev by Date: Re: A good book
- Next by Date: Re: A good book
- Previous by thread: Re: A good book
- Next by thread: Re: A good book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|