Re: Just for the record
- From: Bob Badour <bbadour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:43:20 GMT
Marshall wrote:
Bob Badour wrote:
Gregor Kiczales is a dangerous embecile who took a bad computational
model and made it much, much worse. Thanks to his blithe and ignorant
redefinition of very clear and extremely informative terms, the chances
Dijkstra's posterity will achieve the badly needed maturity for our
profession that Dijkstra, himself, long pursued are greatly reduced.
Well, I've been trying to figure out what specifically you're referring
to, and I'm not having much luck. The author(s) you mention seem
to be associated with Aspect Oriented Programming, which, although
I have no particular reason to think it worth my attention, nonetheless
has not (as far as I know) *redefined* any terms, but rather seems
to have made up their own terms. But perhaps terms such as
"aspects" and "cross cutting" had an earlier meaning I was not
aware of? Or perhaps I'm just missing your direction entirely.
I am particularly disgusted by their perversion of Dijkstra's intellectual discipline of separating of concerns.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Just for the record
- From: erk
- Re: Just for the record
- References:
- Just for the record
- From: Bob Badour
- Re: Just for the record
- From: Marshall
- Just for the record
- Prev by Date: Re: model inherited object
- Next by Date: Re: model inherited object
- Previous by thread: Re: Just for the record
- Next by thread: Re: Just for the record
- Index(es):