Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
- From: "x" <x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:23:46 +0300
"Cimode" <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149576134.051179.262500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Math is indeed the only the ultimate tool for validating/invalidating
computing theory that's why the application of set theory was
successfull to define RM. But all math is not set theory and set
theory does not answer all questions expressed as a consequence of
application of set theory in RM. The same way math is not the only
area that may help solve computing issues but it is a necessary tool to
validate all hypothesis expressed, whether they originate from
empirical reasonning (math) or a natural observation process. (physics
oriented). I believe that in unknown area that remain to be explored,
ecclectic approaches should be guided and validated by math not
burried by it.
I've once written an assembler rutine for copying the character matrices to
the display memory. Looking at the code, I observed some constants. I
replaced the constants with parameters and experimented with various values.
To my surprise, I discovered that the text was displayed in various
interesting ways (skewed, right to left, top to bottom, etc). Math is really
useful sometimes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
- Next by Date: Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
- Previous by thread: Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
