Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
- From: "Cimode" <cimode@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jun 2006 01:55:35 -0700
Thanks for the response...
<<You don't have to worry all that much about what the relational model
allows
or doesn't allow. As anybody here can tell you, there are no pure
relational databases in the Real World. >>I am puzzled by this
statement...Everything in my experience teaches me that the current SQL
implementation have recurring problems because they actuall y do not
support correctly relational concepts...
<<What we have is quasi-relational table-based systems that in fact can
handle
processes very well. >>What do you exactly mean by handling processes
very well? Most systems I face dayly, present grave performance and
administration problems that could be avoided if rules dictated by
normalization were respected...
<<Table-centric systems can. >>I see...What exactly are table centric
systems...Do you mean SQL based systems (ORACLE, DB2, SQL Server)
My concern is about how OO mechanisms could be utilized to allow better
physical implementation of relational concepts...Is Java a potentially
language than SQL for data manipulation, data definition (or
both)...Thanks for your input...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
- Prev by Date: Re: wise words
- Next by Date: Re: Operationalize orthogonality
- Previous by thread: Re: wise words
- Next by thread: Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|