comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Unpredictable programming
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Unpredictable programming
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Unpredictable programming
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: OO versus RDB
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: OO versus RDB
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: sql-99 array type
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Lazy summer project: build a basketball app.
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: OO versus RDB
  • From: paul c
• Re: No exceptions?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• No exceptions?
  • From: paul c
• Re: sql-99 array type
  • From: Sandy . Pittendrigh
• Re: sql-99 array type
  • From: vc
• Re: sql-99 array type
  • From: Bob Badour
• sql-99 array type
  • From: Darnel Castnblast
• Re: Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vc
• Re: Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vc
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: erk
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: erk
• Re: Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vc
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: j . andersen . lv
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: j . andersen . lv
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Just for the record
  • From: Bob Badour
• Just for the record
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: OT: And the answer is
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Database design question
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: erk
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Erwin
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Erwin
• OT: And the answer is
  • From: Marshall
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: OO solution?
  • From: Bob Badour
• OO solution?
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Bob Stearns
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Database design question
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Database design question
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Database design question
  • From: sreedhardasi
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Dan
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Michael Gaab
• Re: Database design question
  • From: sreedhardasi
• Re: Database design question
  • From: Bob Badour
• Database design question
  • From: sreedhardasi
• Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Tony D
• Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: bla
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: Michael Gaab
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: Neo
• definitions for conceptual, logical, physical
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Canonical DB
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Canonical DB
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Erwin
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: x
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Erwin
• Re: linear syntax?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: What databases have taught me
  • From: paul c
• Re: linear syntax?
  • From: paul c
• Re: linear syntax?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: -CELKO-
• Bags vs. Sets
  • From: vadimtro
• linear syntax?
  • From: paul c
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: Peter Liedermann
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Cimode
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: paul c
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: terminology
  • From: U-gene
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: Dieter Noeth
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: ANSI Join improvement
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• ANSI Join improvement
  • From: kvnkrkptrck
• Re: Business model tied to relational world
  • From: Cimode
• Business model tied to relational world
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Note to Tony D
  • From: Cimode
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Note to Tony D
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Cimode
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Note to Tony D
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Note to Tony D
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: erk
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: erk
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Note to Tony D
  • From: Dave Greenwood
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: model inherited object
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Erwin
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• model inherited object
  • From: deja
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number Null:
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: racimo
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: x
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Fraud Number Null:
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Pickie
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: frosty
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: erk
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: racimo
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Neo
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: erk
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: erk
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: frosty
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• How to Tell if You Are a Crank
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Tony D
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Help with SQL query.... I'm sure there is a way!
  • From: Jarl Hermansson
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Erwin
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: racimo
• Help with SQL query.... I'm sure there is a way!
  • From: bjorn . bergstrom
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On Cimode
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• On Cimode
  • From: racimo
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Neo
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDBMS samples
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: terminology
  • From: Tony D
• Re: terminology
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: oract
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: oract
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: oract
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDBMS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: oract
• Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
  • From: oract
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Erwin
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Tony D
• Re: terminology
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Erwin
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: RDMBS samples
  • From: Cimode
• RDMBS samples
  • From: Ovidiu.Silaghi
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Marshall
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Example of expression bias?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: terminology
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Pickie
• Example of expression bias?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: terminology
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: Pickie
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Marshall
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: terminology
  • From: Tony D
• Re: terminology
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Pickie
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: terminology
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: paul c
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: terminology
  • From: Cimode
• terminology
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: filters
  • From: paul c
• Re: OT: filters
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: filters
  • From: paul c
• OT: filters
  • From: paul c
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 3: U-Gene
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt
  • From: Cimode
• Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Carl Federl
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Marshall
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• OT: Troll vs. Crank
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Erwin
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: x
• Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Little question for RDM theoristes
  • From: U-gene
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: bbadour
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Tony D
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Dan
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: paul c
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: paul c
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: paul c
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Lets get physical
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: paul c
• Lets get physical
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: paul c
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Marshall
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: x
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Results in Parallel columns
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• To Bob Badour, sorry
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: x
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: paul c
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: frebe73
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: frebe73
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: x
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Foreign key problem
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Foreign key problem
  • From: frebe73
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: JOG
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: x
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: x
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• links for TTM material
  • From: paul c
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?
  • From: kumar . vaibhav . jain
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: children
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: -CELKO-
• children
  • From: Nohup
• Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: paul c
• Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: paul c
• Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: Bob Badour
• curiousity of sets of no relations?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: paul c
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: x
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Neo
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: paul c
• Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: Marshall
• Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Littldarln
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vc
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Roy Hann
• A better SQL implementation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Erwin
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: erk
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vc
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: paul c
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: paul c
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: vc
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vc
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vc
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: erk
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: erk
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: erk
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: x
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: JXStern
• Bob Badour:your credentials
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: data management
  • From: paul c
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Bob Badour
• Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Date range searches
  • From: eselk
• Re: Date range searches
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Date range searches
  • From: eselk
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Cimode
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Anith Sen
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: erk
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: x
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: x
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: x
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: JXStern
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Marshall
• twit-filters and honesty
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Marshall
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: paul c
• Re: twit-filters and honesty
  • From: paul c
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Marshall
• Re: a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer contributions of VI
  • From: paul c
• a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer contributions of VI
  • From: mAsterdam
• twit-filters and honesty
  • From: mAsterdam
• twit-filters and honesty
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: Marshall
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: paul c
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Bob Badour
• twit-filters and honesty
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: paul c
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: cdt glossary [persistence]
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: paul c
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: vc
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: JXStern
• Re: OT usenet quoting
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: vc
• OT usenet quoting
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: paul c
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: paul c
• Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Marshall
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: paul c
• Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Poll: Expert user vs. Internals Expert
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: vc
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• dbd (was: The wisdom of the object mentors)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Neo
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Neo
• Re: OT fallacies
  • From: Bob Badour
• Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: OT fallacies
  • From: paul c
• Re: OT fallacies
  • From: paul c
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Bye
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: wise words
  • From: x
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: Rich Ryan
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: wise words
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: wise words
  • From: x
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: Erwin
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: x
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
  • From: Cimode
• Re: wise words
  • From: x
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: J M Davitt
• Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Relational Divsion
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Operationalize orthogonality
  • From: Pickie

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(12)