comp.databases.theory

• Date Index

---

• Re: Unpredictable programming, Jay Dee
  • Re: Unpredictable programming, Marshall
    • Re: Unpredictable programming, Gene Wirchenko
• Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., kvnkrkptrck
  • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., Bob Badour
    • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., Bob Badour
      • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., kvnkrkptrck
  • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., J M Davitt
    • Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app., kvnkrkptrck
• Re: OO versus RDB, paul c
  • Re: OO versus RDB, Bob Badour
    • Re: OO versus RDB, paul c
• No exceptions?, paul c
  • Re: No exceptions?, Marshall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • No exceptions?, paul c
    • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, J M Davitt
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, J M Davitt
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, J M Davitt
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: No exceptions?, J M Davitt
      • Re: No exceptions?, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: No exceptions?, Bob Badour
      • Re: No exceptions?, paul c
      • Re: No exceptions?, Marshall
• sql-99 array type, Darnel Castnblast
  • Re: sql-99 array type, Bob Badour
  • Re: sql-99 array type, vc
    • Re: sql-99 array type, Sandy . Pittendrigh
      • Re: sql-99 array type, J M Davitt
• Just for the record, Bob Badour
  • Re: Just for the record, Bob Badour
  • Re: Just for the record, Marshall
    • Re: Just for the record, Bob Badour
      • Re: Just for the record, erk
      • Re: Just for the record, Bob Badour
      • Re: Just for the record, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: Just for the record, Bob Badour
      • Re: Just for the record, erk
• OT: And the answer is, Marshall
  • Re: OT: And the answer is, Bob Badour
• Database design question, sreedhardasi
  • Re: Database design question, Bob Badour
    • Re: Database design question, sreedhardasi
      • Re: Database design question, Bob Badour
      • Re: Database design question, Erwin
      • Re: Database design question, Erwin
      • Re: Database design question, Erwin
  • Re: Database design question, Michael Gaab
  • Re: Database design question, Dan
    • Re: Database design question, sreedhardasi
      • Re: Database design question, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: Database design question, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: Database design question, Jay Dee
  • Re: Database design question, Bob Stearns
  • OO solution?, kvnkrkptrck
    • Re: OO solution?, Bob Badour
      • Re: OO solution?, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: OO solution?, Bob Badour
      • Re: OO solution?, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: OO solution?, Erwin
      • Re: OO solution?, erk
      • Re: OO solution?, Bob Badour
      • Re: OO solution?, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: OO solution?, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: OO solution?, mAsterdam
      • Re: OO solution?, David Cressey
    • Re: OO solution?, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: Database design question, David Fetter
• Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me, J M Davitt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me, paul c
    • Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
• definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, Marshall
  • Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, Neo
    • Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, bla
  • Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, mAsterdam
  • Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, Michael Gaab
  • Re: definitions for conceptual, logical, physical, Erwin
• Re: Canonical DB, J M Davitt
  • Re: Canonical DB, Bob Badour
• Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What databases have taught me, x
  • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
    • Re: What databases have taught me, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: What databases have taught me, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
      • Re: What databases have taught me, Tony D
  • Re: What databases have taught me, Marshall
  • Re: What databases have taught me, J M Davitt
  • Re: What databases have taught me, J M Davitt
    • Re: What databases have taught me, Bob Badour
  • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
    • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
  • Re: What databases have taught me, J M Davitt
  • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
  • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
  • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
  • Re: What databases have taught me, paul c
• linear syntax?, paul c
  • Re: linear syntax?, -CELKO-
    • Re: linear syntax?, paul c
      • Re: linear syntax?, J M Davitt
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP, Peter Liedermann
  • Bags vs. Sets, vadimtro
    • Re: Bags vs. Sets, vc
      • Re: Bags vs. Sets, vadimtro
      • Re: Bags vs. Sets, vc
      • Re: Bags vs. Sets, vadimtro
      • Re: Bags vs. Sets, vc
• ANSI Join improvement, kvnkrkptrck
  • Re: ANSI Join improvement, kvnkrkptrck
    • Re: ANSI Join improvement, Dieter Noeth
      • Re: ANSI Join improvement, kvnkrkptrck
  • Re: ANSI Join improvement, Aloha Kakuikanu
    • Re: ANSI Join improvement, kvnkrkptrck
      • Re: ANSI Join improvement, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: ANSI Join improvement, paul c
  • Re: ANSI Join improvement, Kenneth Downs
• Business model tied to relational world, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: Business model tied to relational world, Cimode
• Note to Tony D, Dave Greenwood
  • Re: Note to Tony D, Keith H Duggar
    • Re: Note to Tony D, Cimode
    • Re: Note to Tony D, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Note to Tony D, Cimode
• model inherited object, deja
  • Re: model inherited object, Erwin
    • Re: model inherited object, deja
      • Re: model inherited object, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: model inherited object, deja
      • Re: model inherited object, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: model inherited object, deja
      • Re: model inherited object, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: model inherited object, -CELKO-
      • Re: model inherited object, deja
      • Re: model inherited object, -CELKO-
      • Re: model inherited object, Erwin
      • Re: model inherited object, Erwin
      • Re: model inherited object, deja
  • Re: model inherited object, Bob Badour
    • Re: model inherited object, Cimode
    • Re: model inherited object, deja
      • Re: model inherited object, Bob Badour
      • Re: model inherited object, Cimode
  • Re: model inherited object, Alvin Ryder
  • Re: model inherited object, j . andersen . lv
    • Re: model inherited object, Bob Badour
      • Re: model inherited object, j . andersen . lv
      • Re: model inherited object, Bob Badour
• Fraud Number Null:, Bob Badour
  • Re: Fraud Number Null:, Cimode
• Help with SQL query.... I'm sure there is a way!, bjorn . bergstrom
  • Re: Help with SQL query.... I'm sure there is a way!, Jarl Hermansson
• On Cimode, racimo
  • Re: On Cimode, Roy Hann
    • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
      • Re: On Cimode, Tony D
      • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
      • Re: On Cimode, Tony D
    • Re: On Cimode, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
      • Re: On Cimode, Pickie
      • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
      • Re: On Cimode, racimo
  • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
    • Re: On Cimode, racimo
      • Re: On Cimode, Cimode
      • Re: On Cimode, frosty
      • Re: On Cimode, racimo
      • Re: On Cimode, frosty
    • Re: On Cimode, Tony D
• Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, oract
  • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, Cimode
    • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, oract
      • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, Cimode
      • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, oract
      • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, oract
      • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, Cimode
      • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?, oract
• RDMBS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
  • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
    • Re: RDMBS samples, Roy Hann
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Tony D
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
  • Re: RDMBS samples, Kenneth Downs
  • Re: RDMBS samples, x
    • Re: RDBMS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
      • Re: RDBMS samples, x
    • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Marshall
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
    • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Cimode
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, x
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Erwin
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Tony D
  • Re: RDMBS samples, -CELKO-
    • Re: RDMBS samples, Ovidiu.Silaghi
      • Re: RDMBS samples, Bob Badour
• Example of expression bias?, Keith H Duggar
  • Re: Example of expression bias?, Marshall
    • Re: Example of expression bias?, Erwin
    • Re: Example of expression bias?, Erwin
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Marshall
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Neo
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Neo
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Marshall
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, erk
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Erwin
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, paul c
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, J M Davitt
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Cimode
      • Re: Example of expression bias?, Tony D
• Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Keith H Duggar
    • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Marshall
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Pickie
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Marshall
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Roy Hann
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Pickie
      • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Keith H Duggar
  • Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar, Cimode
• terminology, Marshall
  • Re: terminology, Cimode
    • Re: terminology, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: terminology, Cimode
  • Re: terminology, Cimode
  • Re: terminology, paul c
    • Re: terminology, Cimode
    • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Cimode
      • Re: terminology, Pickie
      • Re: terminology, paul c
      • Re: terminology, Pickie
      • Re: terminology, paul c
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, paul c
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Cimode
      • Re: terminology, Tony D
      • Re: terminology, Tony D
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Tony D
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Tony D
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Tony D
      • Re: terminology, paul c
      • Re: terminology, paul c
      • Re: terminology, Marshall
      • Re: terminology, Cimode
  • Re: terminology, U-gene
    • Re: terminology, Cimode
• OT: filters, paul c
  • Re: OT: filters, paul c
    • Re: OT: filters, Tony D
      • Re: OT: filters, paul c
• Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Tony D
    • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Pickie
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Pickie
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, mAsterdam
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Bob Badour
      • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour, Cimode
• Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs, Erwin
    • Re: Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs, Cimode
• Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
    • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
    • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Erwin
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Bob Badour
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Bob Badour
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene, Cimode
• Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, J M Davitt
    • Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, Pickie
      • Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, J M Davitt
      • Re: Fraud Number 2: J M Davitt, Cimode
• Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
  • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
    • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Tony D
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Marshall
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
      • Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL, Cimode
• OT: Troll vs. Crank, Marshall
  • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
  • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Keith H Duggar
    • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Tony D
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, David Cressey
    • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Marshall
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, mAsterdam
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, mAsterdam
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Pickie
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Pickie
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
  • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Rich Ryan
  • Re: Troll vs. Crank, David Cressey
  • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
    • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Tony D
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Tony D
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
    • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, x
      • Re: Troll vs. Crank, Cimode
    • How to Tell if You Are a Crank, Marshall
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, erk
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, x
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, Cimode
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, erk
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, Cimode
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: How to Tell if You Are a Crank, Cimode
• Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
  • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Erwin
    • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Erwin
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Erwin
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
  • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, x
    • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
  • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
    • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, U-gene
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Erwin
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, J M Davitt
  • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Marshall
  • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, J M Davitt
    • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, J M Davitt
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
      • Re: Little question for RDM theoristes, Cimode
• Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
  • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Erwin
    • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Erwin
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, David Cressey
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Cimode
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Cimode
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Cimode
    • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Results in Parallel columns, paul c
    • Re: Results in Parallel columns, -CELKO-
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, paul c
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, paul c
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, David Cressey
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, -CELKO-
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, David Cressey
      • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Marshall
  • Re: Results in Parallel columns, x
    • Re: Results in Parallel columns, Kenneth Downs
• To Bob Badour, sorry, Rich Ryan
  • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
    • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Roy Hann
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Roy Hann
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Pickie
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Pickie
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, erk
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Rich Ryan
    • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
    • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, x
    • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Dan
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, erk
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Tony D
      • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
  • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, bbadour
    • Re: To Bob Badour, sorry, Cimode
• Foreign key problem, frebe73
  • Re: Foreign key problem, Tony Andrews
    • Re: Foreign key problem, Tony Andrews
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
  • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Foreign key problem, frebe73
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Bob Badour
      • Re: Foreign key problem, frebe73
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Bob Badour
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Foreign key problem, mAsterdam
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Foreign key problem, mAsterdam
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Foreign key problem, mAsterdam
      • Re: Foreign key problem, mAsterdam
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Foreign key problem, mAsterdam
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Kenneth Downs
  • Re: Foreign key problem, Rich Ryan
    • Re: Foreign key problem, Erwin
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
    • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Bob Badour
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
  • Re: Foreign key problem, x
  • Re: Foreign key problem, Jay Dee
    • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Jay Dee
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, Jay Dee
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, paul c
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
      • Re: Foreign key problem, -CELKO-
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
  • Re: Foreign key problem, -CELKO-
    • Re: Foreign key problem, x
    • Re: Foreign key problem, David Cressey
      • Re: Foreign key problem, -CELKO-
      • Re: Foreign key problem, x
  • Re: Foreign key problem, -CELKO-
    • Re: Foreign key problem, Erwin
• links for TTM material, paul c
• Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, kumar . vaibhav . jain
  • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, J M Davitt
    • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, David Cressey
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Paul
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, David Cressey
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Paul
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, David Cressey
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, David Cressey
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, David Cressey
      • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, J M Davitt
  • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, Cimode
  • Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?, x
• children, Nohup
  • Re: children, -CELKO-
• Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, David Fetter
  • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, Marshall
    • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, Mark D Powell
  • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, David Cressey
    • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, Kenneth Downs
  • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, -CELKO-
    • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, -CELKO-
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
    • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, David Fetter
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, -CELKO-
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, paul c
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, -CELKO-
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, David Cressey
      • Re: Named Mistakes and Questionable Practices, -CELKO-
• A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
  • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Roy Hann
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
  • Re: A better SQL implementation?, David Portas
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, paul c
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, David Cressey
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, paul c
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, David Cressey
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, paul c
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, paul c
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Neo
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, David Portas
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, David Portas
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Bob Badour
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
  • Re: A better SQL implementation?, J M Davitt
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Bob Badour
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, paul c
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, x
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, J M Davitt
      • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
  • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Carl Federl
    • Re: A better SQL implementation?, Cimode
• Bob Badour:your credentials, Rich Ryan
  • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Mikito Harakiri
    • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, David Cressey
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Bob Badour
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, vc
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Erwin
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Cimode
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, JOG
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Erwin
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Roy Hann
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, x
      • Re: Bob Badour:your credentials, Cimode
• Re: data management, paul c
• Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Rich Ryan
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, erk
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Rich Ryan
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, x
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, x
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, x
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, erk
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, erk
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Erwin
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • curiousity of sets of no relations?, paul c
      • Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?, Bob Badour
      • Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?, Bob Badour
      • Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?, paul c
      • Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?, paul c
      • Re: curiousity of sets of no relations?, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Pickie
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Bob Badour
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, vc
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, David Cressey
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Alfredo Novoa
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Littldarln
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Marshall
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, x
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
  • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Erwin
    • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, David Cressey
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, David Cressey
      • Re: Programming is the Engineering Discipline of the Science that is Mathematics, Cimode
• Date range searches, eselk
  • Re: Date range searches, Mikito Harakiri
    • Re: Date range searches, eselk
• twit-filters and honesty, mAsterdam
• Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, mAsterdam
  • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, paul c
    • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, paul c
      • Message not available
      • Re: cdt glossary [persistence], paul c
    • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Bob Badour
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, paul c
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Bob Badour
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, paul c
      • a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer contributions of VI, mAsterdam
      • Re: a misleading and incorrect glossary through the volunteer contributions of VI, paul c
      • twit-filters and honesty, mAsterdam
      • Re: twit-filters and honesty, paul c
      • twit-filters and honesty, mAsterdam
      • twit-filters and honesty, mAsterdam
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Marshall
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Bob Badour
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Anith Sen
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Bob Badour
    • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Marshall
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, paul c
      • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, Marshall
    • Re: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1, David Cressey
• Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, JXStern
  • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Marshall
    • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, paul c
    • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, erk
      • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Cimode
  • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, JXStern
      • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Cimode
      • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Kenneth Downs
  • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Alvin Ryder
    • Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational, Marshall
• Re: Poll: Expert user vs. Internals Expert, JXStern
• dbd (was: The wisdom of the object mentors), mAsterdam
• Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vadimtro
  • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Marshall
    • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Bob Badour
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Marshall
    • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, David Cressey
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Marshall
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, David Cressey
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Frank Hamersley
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vc
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Frank Hamersley
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vc
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Frank Hamersley
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vc
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vc
    • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, vadimtro
      • Re: Aggregation (with GBY) is Relational Division, Mikito Harakiri
• Re: OT fallacies, paul c
  • Re: OT fallacies, paul c
  • Re: OT fallacies, Bob Badour
• Re: Bye, mAsterdam
• Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
  • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, J M Davitt
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, J M Davitt
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Marshall
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Marshall
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • OT usenet quoting, mAsterdam
      • Re: OT usenet quoting, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, J M Davitt
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, JXStern
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, JXStern
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, JXStern
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, erk
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, JXStern
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Keith H Duggar
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, vc
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, vc
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, vc
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Jay Dee
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, paul c
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, paul c
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, paul c
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, paul c
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, paul c
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Bob Badour
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, x
      • Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model, Cimode
      • Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, J M Davitt
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, J M Davitt
      • Re: Lets get physical, Bob Badour
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, paul c
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical, Cimode
      • Re: Lets get physical<