Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:21:45 GMT
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Marshall wrote:
I randomly surfed my way to a PC World article on the
"25 Worst Tech Tech Products of All Time." It was actually
better done than those sorts of things usually are.
I was interested to see item #5: dBASE IV.
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,125772,pg,3,00.asp#dbase
Roughly, the blurb claims the company went from market leader
to nowheresville on the "strength" of this single release.
I vaguely remember Ashton-Tate as a once-was tech giant.
Anyone have any stories about this they'd care to share?
When I was sixteen there was a huge shrink-wrapped box on the shelf called
"dBase II". (I was later to find out there never was a dbase I). It was
up there with another intimidating $600.00 box labeled "Lotus 123".
A few years later I made the same basic discovery that those countless other
consultants made. Being unschooled in any kind of relational theory, if in
fact we had any formal computer education at all, and with backgrounds
ranging from Physics to History, we recognized a product with immense
intuitive appeal. We saw that we could grind out apps fast that people
would pay good money for.
That product by the way was Foxpro. By the time dbase IV came around, the
shops that had built their fortunes on it were already breaking up. They
can blame Ashton-Tate if they want, but I took more than one job from them
and from I could tell they all thought they were IBM. They were fat,
arrogant, uncompromising, and disappearing.
My generation of consultants would never have touched dbase, it was already
the dinosaur. Foxpro was the bees knees. When C/S came along fox morphed
beautifully and went along. I elected not to use it for 3-tier because for
one it was too much of a stretch of its original intent, and for two
Microsoft doesn't want me to use it on Linux, so I granted their wish and
don't use their products at all anymore.
My poison was Clipper Summer 87 and then 5.01 from Nantucket (the 2 gold releases). When Foxpro came out it was seen more as a clone of the dBase user environment while Clipper was a *woo hoo* compiler (well sort of)! I ended up using Foxpro on SCO for an app that lasted for 15 years before it was retired. It was fast and quite reliable.
When M$ bought FoxPro and Nantucket went off with VO - soon followed by CA slurping Nantucket up, the future was writ large on the wall.
About then I suspended my coding activities and became a dreaded consultant and then even worse, a project manager!
Cheers, Frank.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: x
- Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- References:
- Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: Marshall
- Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Bull-fight avoidance
- Next by Date: Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- Previous by thread: Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- Next by thread: Re: Mildly OT: dBASE IV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading