Re: About empty battles
- From: "Tony D" <tonyisyourpal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2006 19:24:22 -0700
I'm sure I read somewhere that a deliberate pre-emptive invocation of
Godwin's Law never actually works ... so we're still on for (yet
another) discussion of Pick. 1/2 are looking like good odds now ...
David Cressey wrote:
"JOG" <jog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146229967.018902.46390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'll take odds of 2-1 on, that this thread still ends up discussing
Pick.
That sounds like something Hitler would have said!
(That skipped over a few intermediate steps, I'll guess)
.
- References:
- About empty battles
- From: x
- Re: About empty battles
- From: JOG
- Re: About empty battles
- From: David Cressey
- About empty battles
- Prev by Date: Re: About empty battles
- Next by Date: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Previous by thread: Re: About empty battles
- Next by thread: Functional dependency is multivalued dependency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|