Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: "JOG" <jog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2006 06:06:54 -0700
x wrote:
"David Cressey" <dcressey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0jn4g.5128$7c.4397@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Rich Ryan" <rryan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5kb4g.11880$%m4.8463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm a programmer from the mid 70's. At that time the language of choicewas
Pascal and I think PL1. Both were very expressive in an algothrimic way.The
seminal work was "A Discipline of Programming". And also ""The Elementsof
Programming Style" ala Strunk and White.
Rich
In the mid '70s, I was doing some extracurricular programming in Algol.I
didn't run across Pascal until 1980. A few years later, I ran across ateaching
book, "Pascal with Style". Very good book. I think we should be
elements of style to beginnig programmers.
In the '70s I was learning to speak :-)
I didn't run across Pascal until 1988.
If it were hard, I might have stumbled on it earlier. :-)
I think Pascal was (is) a good language. I wish there were a languagethat
does for OOP what Pascal did for structured programming.
Almost everyone here learned programming by using Pascal since it was
available.
These years it was proposed to replace it with Oracle :-).
Pascal was and is a great language, and the first I learnt. I wish it
was still taught at an undergraduate level as an introduction to
programming instead of Java, which, as an educational tool, is
disastrous.
.
- References:
- Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: Rich Ryan
- Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: x
- Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Prev by Date: Re: About empty battles
- Next by Date: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Previous by thread: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Next by thread: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|