Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:08:09 GMT
David Cressey wrote:
"Rich Ryan" <rryan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5kb4g.11880$%m4.8463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm a programmer from the mid 70's. At that time the language of choicewasPascal and I think PL1. Both were very expressive in an algothrimic way.Theseminal work was "A Discipline of Programming". And also ""The ElementsofProgramming Style" ala Strunk and White.
Rich
In the mid '70s, I was doing some extracurricular programming in Algol. I
didn't run across Pascal until 1980. A few years later, I ran across a
book, "Pascal with Style". Very good book. I think we should be teaching
elements of style to beginnig programmers.
I think Pascal was (is) a good language. I wish there were a language that
does for OOP what Pascal did for structured programming.
Reaches for "Pascal User Manual and Report 2nd Edition" published by Springer-Verlag 1978 evoking memories of a prof mad about recursion and Pascal as the language to teach it! It looks like it was typeset on a CDC 132 column line printer and diagrammed by hand.
Cost $8.00 AUD in 1979, value...priceless!
Cheers, Frank.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: Tony D
- Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- References:
- Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: Rich Ryan
- Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- From: David Cressey
- Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Prev by Date: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Next by Date: Re: About empty battles
- Previous by thread: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Next by thread: Re: Beautifiul Mind: Thinking about Dijkstra
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|