comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: counting rows
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: counting rows
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: counting rows
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• The Birth of JOIN
  • From: Strider
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: x
• Re: counting rows
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: counting rows
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Data Model
  • From: topmind
• Re: Interesting article: In the Beginning: An RDBMS history
  • From: paul c
• Re: counting rows
  • From: paul c
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: paul c
• Re: counting rows
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: counting rows
  • From: paul c
• Re: Interesting article: In the Beginning: An RDBMS history
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relational lattice completeness
  • From: Jan Hidders
• counting rows
  • From: bucaliman@xxxxxxxxx
• Relational lattice completeness
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: paul c
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: JOG
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Interesting article: In the Beginning: An RDBMS history
  • From: x
• Re: Tutorial D with + restrict
  • From: Strider
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: x
• Re: Tutorial D with + restrict
  • From: x
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Tutorial D with + restrict
  • From: Strider
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Logical data design, Pick style
  • From: dawn
• Logical data design, Pick style
  • From: dawn
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Philosophical banter
  • From: paul c
• FUN: The Birth of JOIN
  • From: strider5
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Philosophical banter
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Philosophical banter
  • From: paul c
• Philosophical banter
  • From: HungryLion
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: dawn
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: JOG
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: x
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: dawn
• Any Errata for Codd's 1970 'A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks'?
  • From: jonathan . leffler
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS: Special Issue on Advances in Information Engineering
  • From: imecs2006
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: k-nearest neighbor a supervised data mining method?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: JOG
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: falcon
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: x
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: x
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: JOG
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: JOG
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: paul c
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: falcon
• Re: k-nearest neighbor a supervised data mining method?
  • From: Rich F
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: mountain man
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: k-nearest neighbor a supervised data mining method?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• k-nearest neighbor a supervised data mining method?
  • From: Rich F
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: mountain man
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: vc
• Re: Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: paul c
• Date, Darwen, Pascal and the alternative to Nulls in the RM
  • From: Paul Mansour
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: x
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Need some hints for a multi-language (mysql) site
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: JOG
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More on lists and sets
  • From: JOG
• Re: Logical Attribute or not
  • From: sagaeta
• More on lists and sets
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: paul c
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Need some hints for a multi-language (mysql) site
  • From: Martien van Wanrooij
• Re: Need some hints for a multi-language (mysql) site
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Need some hints for a multi-language (mysql) site
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Paul Mansour
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Need some hints for a multi-language (mysql) site
  • From: Martien van Wanrooij
• CJ Date on Missing Information
  • From: Paul Mansour
• Re: Logical Attribute or not
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Logical Attribute or not
  • From: David Portas
• Logical Attribute or not
  • From: sagaeta
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Earthbased
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: michael
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: x
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: michael
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: dave
• Re: need info: small local copy of large remote database
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: dawn
• need info: small local copy of large remote database
  • From: falcon
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: dawn
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: dawn
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Syntacs, Semantics, and the Problem Domain
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Barbara
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: sonja
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: dave
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Steve
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: SD
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Lookup Tables, the right way?
  • From: Jason Williams
• Re: Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Lookup Tables, the right way ?
  • From: jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Pickie
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Pickie
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• inconsistent data for evaluation of algorithm
  • From: andreil
• Re: tree like database structure
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: tree like database structure
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: x
• Re: tree like database structure
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: tree like database structure
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• tree like database structure
  • From: Abhi
• Re: OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: jason.glumidge@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: jason.glumidge@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: x
• Re: OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• OT - Dragoncountries (was: Declarative constraints in practical terms)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• the most beautiful girl team all over the world in the year 2006
  • From: zy19840501@xxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Data Model
  • From: B Faux
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Beautiful Note girl team
  • From: B Faux
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vldm10
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Beautiful Note girl team brief introduction
  • From: zy19840501@xxxxxxxx
• Beautiful Note girl team
  • From: zy19840501@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: Which book do these appendices come from?
  • From: JOG
• Which book do these appendices come from?
  • From: Nameless
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: JOG
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: JOG
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Generalized query to determine the table a query or a view's columns come from?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Data Model
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Mark Johnson
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Carl Federl
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Generalized query to determine the table a query or a view's columns come from?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Generalized query to determine the table a query or a view's columns come from?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Generalized query to determine the table a query or a view's columns come from?
  • From: professor chen
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Data Model
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Data Model
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Data Model
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Psychological Test on Personal Orientation
  • From: ggroups@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: vc
• Re: Beautiful Note girl team
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Beautiful Note girl team
  • From: zy19840501@xxxxxxxx
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Pickie
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Bob Stearns
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: dawn
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Mark Johnson
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Data Model
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Data Model
  • From: matthewdavis1980
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: David Portas
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: x
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: x
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: dawn
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: ralphbecket
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: dawn
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: ralphbecket
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: ralphbecket
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Glossary 0.1.1
  • From: B Faux
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: circular relationships ok?
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• circular relationships ok?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Attribution for modeling data with relations
  • From: dawn
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: vc
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Bob Hairgrove
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: x
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: vc
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: vc
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: MV Keys
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
  • From: ralphbecket
• Glossary 0.1.1
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Mark Johnson
• Re: We have a troll
  • From: Jan M. Nelken

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2006-03