Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:06:47 -0800
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:53:04 +0200, "x" <x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"dawn" <dawnwolthuis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1138652402.406877.187710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> No. It is used as a model, a metaphor. So, what are your precise
>> definitions for hardware and software -- the ones you gave earlier or
>> do you want to revise? --dawn
>
>Any computer can be divided in two disjoint parts: the hardware and the
>software.
>The software is the part that can be easily changed to modify the function
>of a computer.
"easily" does not begin to address the essence of the difference.
How many people do you know who can install a motherboard? Be
sure to count all the people at the local computer/electronics stores.
How many people do you know who write an accounting app? To be
fair, be sure to count all the people at the local
computer/electronics stores. What do you mean you only found one?
By that, hardware is software, and software is hardware.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
.
- References:
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: Todd
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: dawn
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: Leif B. Kristensen
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: dawn
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: x
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: dawn
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: x
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: dawn
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- From: x
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- Prev by Date: Re: all foreign key should have index?
- Next by Date: Re: all foreign key should have index?
- Previous by thread: Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- Next by thread: Re: Reminder, blatant ad
- Index(es):