comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Ernst-Udo Wallenborn
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: all foreign key should have index?
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: Sandy . Pittendrigh
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: x
• all foreign key should have index?
  • From: Murtuja
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Rqst for Inventory Database Best Practices
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: x
• Rqst for Inventory Database Best Practices
  • From: DeepDiver
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: x
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: dawn
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: Sandy . Pittendrigh
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: David Portas
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Todd
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Leif B. Kristensen
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Why not many2one with pk array type
  • From: Sandy . Pittendrigh
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Todd
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: JOG
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: David Cressey
• modeling either/or relationship...
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Jan Hidders
• XIME-P 2006: Call for Papers
  • From: Torsten Grust
• CALL FOR PAPERS: Special Issue on Advances in Information Engineering
  • From: imecs__2006
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Reminder, blatant ad
  • From: dawn
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: B Faux
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: Jan Hidders
• XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
  • From: beelzebub
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: B Faux
• Re: Separation of DDL and DML - was: Early and late binding.
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: paul c
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: SQL for Smarties
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Separation of DDL and DML - was: Early and late binding.
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Portas
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: vldm10
• Re: SQL for Smarties
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: SQL for Smarties
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: Multisets and 3VL
  • From: vc
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Multisets and 3VL
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: Modelling Problem
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL for Smarties
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: paul c
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: paul c
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: Modelling Problem
  • From: Diggers
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Modelling Problem
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Modelling Problem
  • From: Diggers
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: Relate sets of data
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Early and late binding.
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Early and late binding.
  • From: David Cressey
• SQL for Smarties
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Relate sets of data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Leif B. Kristensen
• Re: Searching question
  • From: Bob Stearns
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Relate sets of data
  • From: johnleitao
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Searching question
  • From: Hege
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: paul c
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Portas
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Tony Rogerson
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: David Portas
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Frostillicus
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: x
• Re: candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: zeldorblat
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• Re: Multisets and 3VL
  • From: vc
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: JOG
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: JOG
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: x
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Tool to transform db schema into DDL for different databases
  • From: David Fetter
• candidate keys in abstract parent relations
  • From: Forrest L Norvell
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: michael
• One table or two?
  • From: Frostillicus
• Re: Multisets and 3VL
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: Knowledge and Ignorance over Time
  • From: Todd
• Re: Multisets and 3VL
  • From: vc
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: Jay Dee
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mountain man
• Multisets and 3VL
  • From: David Fetter
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mountain man
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Knowledge and Ignorance over Time
  • From: B Faux
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: B Faux
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: frosty
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: x
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: x
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: wtxwtx
• Re: MV and SQL
  • From: dawn
• MV and SQL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: JOG
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: B Faux
• CFP: SEKE-2006
  • From: C.Kloukinas
• newbie (relatively) - XML Compressor and XQuery doubt
  • From: Scamjunk
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Tool to transform db schema into DDL for different databases
  • From: wallace reis
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: mountain man
• terminological definition of OI: data + programs = (data processing) intelligence
  • From: mountain man
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: B Faux
• Re: Data Management
  • From: B Faux
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: wtxwtx
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: JOG
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: wtxwtx
• Data Management
  • From: mac.michaluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• screendata (was something NULL)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: paul c
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: paul c
• Re: What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: wtxwtx
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• What is the most difficult search operations for criminal finger print
  • From: wtxwtx
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: paul c
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: paul c
• Re: Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Announcing New Blog
  • From: dawn
• Re: Tool to transform db schema into DDL for different databases
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: picksupport
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: mAsterdam
• Tool to transform db schema into DDL for different databases
  • From: firestormua
• B+Tree implementation questions
  • From: chr1701
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: paul c
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: open source PostgreSQL not supportable? (Was: Challenging SQL Query Problem. Can you solve it?)
  • From: paul c
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: date function
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• date function
  • From: mohitguptainfo@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to search?
  • From: Murdoc
• Schema Advice
  • From: Mag Gam
• Re: How to search?
  • From: MinZero
• Re: How to search?
  • From: MinZero
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: paul c
• Re: SQLServer360.com
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: need some SQL help
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: How to search?
  • From: Todd
• Re: SQL Distinct Value and Order by some Field......
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: How to search?
  • From: Murdoc
• Re: How to search?
  • From: x
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: How to search?
  • From: MinZero
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: How to search?
  • From: Todd
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Db design for a flexible search
  • From: LineVoltageHalogen
• Re: Relational Algebra newbie...
  • From: b
• Re: SQL Distinct Value and Order by some Field......
  • From: Tonkuma
• SQL Distinct Value and Order by some Field......
  • From: krishnan
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: dawn
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: dawn
• Re: Relational Algebra newbie...
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• new year wishes from Bob
  • From: mountain man
• Re: What does this NULL mean?
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: Relational Algebra newbie...
  • From: b
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: Daniel J. Rubin
• Re: Best Windows-based database for replication/synchronization
  • From: Daniel J. Rubin
• Re: Is Inheritance in RM possible?
  • From: Daniel J. Rubin
• Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
  • From: Frank Hamersley
• Re: What is Pick anyway?
  • From: DonR
• Re: Relational Algebra newbie...
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Readers/reviewers for blog requested (OT)
  • From: dawn
• How to search?
  • From: MinZero
• Relational Algebra newbie...
  • From: b

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)