Question on Multiplicity
- From: "jason.glumidge@xxxxxxxxx" <Jason.Glumidge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Oct 2005 06:45:18 -0700
Imagine you were knocking up a simple table of animals and their
predominant colors. Something of the order:
----------------------
animal | color
----------------------
swan | white
lion | yellow
oranguatan | orange
----------------------
Consider also that some animals that have multicolored fur. For
instance a zebra is black and white. Keeping the table nice and
normalized yields:
----------------------
animal | color
----------------------
swan | white
lion | yellow
oranguatan | orange
zebra | black
zebra | white
----------------------
Now you find out that while most swans are white, there are some swans,
although a minority, that are completely black. You can't encode that
into table without introducing a new column to identify an individual
instance of an animal, or you will not be able to distinguish between
an entry which is multi-colored (the zebras) and an entry which is
either completely one color or the other (the swans).
Now my question is am I missing anything - is there any method of
making this distinction without having to introduce a new reference
column to resolve the ambiguity?
Many thanks, Jason.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on Multiplicity
- From: Roy Hann
- Re: Question on Multiplicity
- Prev by Date: Re: Table with one row
- Next by Date: Re: Table with one row
- Previous by thread: Software in . Net to retriew yous Statistic
- Next by thread: Re: Question on Multiplicity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|