Re: Nested sort
- From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:52:15 -0700
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:55:27 -0400, Bob Stearns
<rstearns1241@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:48:12 -0400, Bob Stearns
>> <rstearns1241@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>Hugo Kornelis wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:00:45 -0400, Bob Stearns wrote:
>>>>
>>>>(snip)
>>>>>is there (relatively) easy
>>>>>way to present the data in a sorted manner?
>>>>Sure!
>>>>
>>>>SELECT NAMEX
>>>>FROM IS3.LOCATIONS
>>>>WHERE whatever your current where clause is
>>>>ORDER BY NAMEX
>>>That is too easy, I know how to do that. I want a nested sort. All the
>>>first level locations in order(states), the second level within them
>>>sorted(sites), the third level within them sorted (buildings), etc.
>> order by states,sites,buildings
>Those columns dont exist in my table.
It might be time for a redesign then. Sorting by non-existent
data is rather tricky. <EG>
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
.
- References:
- Nested sort
- From: Bob Stearns
- Re: Nested sort
- From: Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Nested sort
- From: Bob Stearns
- Re: Nested sort
- From: Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Nested sort
- From: Bob Stearns
- Nested sort
- Prev by Date: Nested sort, trying again
- Next by Date: Re: Nested sort, trying again
- Previous by thread: Re: Nested sort
- Next by thread: Re: Nested sort
- Index(es):