Re: Are there terms for these?
- From: paul c <toledobythesea@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:16:30 GMT
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Marshall Spight wrote:
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Marshall Spight wrote:
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Given two tables that are not UNION compatible, it seems there are ways to UNION them anyway.
Method 1, Intersect their headers. The resulting header is used to project both tables and now those projections are union compatible. What would this be called?
We've been discussing this a lot. There was even a thead I started about a month ago called (IIRC) What would this operator be called?
This is scary, how did I miss it?
Here it is:
"What to call this operator?"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_thread/thread/7a855309c23c73eb/1aad918848dd35fd
This is very sad. I found the topic incomprehensible and was not following closely. Now I'll have to go back. ...
Hey, Marshall. Sorry, I didn't catch the question the first time. 'Meet' looks like an attractive word to me, both 'meet and proper' and reminds me of a Beatles lyric, 'come together, right now' which seems rather precise as far as computers are concerned.
pc
.
- References:
- Are there terms for these?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Are there terms for these?
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Are there terms for these?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Re: Are there terms for these?
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Are there terms for these?
- From: Kenneth Downs
- Are there terms for these?
- Prev by Date: Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
- Next by Date: Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
- Previous by thread: Re: Are there terms for these?
- Next by thread: Re: Are there terms for these?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|