Dee Dum
- From: "Vadim Tropashko" <vadimtro_invalid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Aug 2005 09:25:49 -0700
VC wrote:
> "Vadim Tropashko" <vadimtro_invalid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1124224573.706452.112000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > vc wrote:
> >> On the other hand:
> >>
> >>
> >> Vadim Tropashko wrote:
> >>
> >> > "10" is defined as a neutral element that satisfies the following
> >> > identities:
> >> >
> >> > 10 join A = A
> >> > 10 union A = A
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> '10' join A = '10', not A ;)
> >
> > So you want to define 01, and 10 the opposite way? Fine for me, since I
> > have always been confused by the left and right:-)
>
> Well, I thought I was using your definition. What relation does '10' refer
> to ?
Oh, I was not reading carefully:
10 join A = A
-----------^^^
10 union A = A
------------^^^
Sure, it's a typo, the definition is totally symmetric. I thought you
wanted to exchange 10 and 01.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dee Dum
- From: vc
- Re: Dee Dum
- References:
- Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: vc
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- From: VC
- Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- Prev by Date: Re: The word "symbol"
- Next by Date: Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- Previous by thread: Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
- Next by thread: Re: Dee Dum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|